Crosswords3 mins ago
Should This Man Be Given Legal Aid?
A Muslim terror fanatic banned from Britain for being a threat to national security has been given legal aid in a bid to win a UK passport.
Tory MP Douglas Carswell said: “Foreigners must think we are mad. We use taxpayers’ cash to allow people who want to defeat us on the battlefield fight us in our courts.” I agree with him.
http://
Tory MP Douglas Carswell said: “Foreigners must think we are mad. We use taxpayers’ cash to allow people who want to defeat us on the battlefield fight us in our courts.” I agree with him.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Of course he should.
This is a similar case.
// Mohamed and Kaltun Hashi, the parents of the 23-year-old care worker from Camden, North London, became concerned for his safety after being tipped off that in the summer he had been taken to a prison in the African state of Djibouti while visiting neighbouring Somalia.
The Mail on Sunday has established that while Mr Hashi was out of Britain, Home Secretary Theresa May used a little-known power – which does not require a court order – to deprive him of all his rights as a British national.
It can also be revealed that Mrs May has issued at least another nine orders against British nationals. The majority have been served on Muslim men, although the most public case is that of Russian spy Anna Chapman, who had been married to a UK national.
The deprivation of citizenship order signed by Mrs May says Mr Hashi has lost his rights to live in the UK because of the ‘public good’.
Mr Hashi has not been told of what he is accused, nor is it clear whether he knows he is no longer a British citizen.
The only justification Mrs May has given for removing Mr Hashi’s citizenship is his alleged involvement in Islamic extremism. But his family say he has never been interested in any kind of extremist behaviour. //
So without any court or any charges, a British Citizen can have their citizenship cancelled on the whim of the Home Secretary. She does not reveal who has been cancelled and does not give any evidence. This is very counter the British Legal system, and of course such wielding of a draconian power should be challdenged in the Courts.
This is a similar case.
// Mohamed and Kaltun Hashi, the parents of the 23-year-old care worker from Camden, North London, became concerned for his safety after being tipped off that in the summer he had been taken to a prison in the African state of Djibouti while visiting neighbouring Somalia.
The Mail on Sunday has established that while Mr Hashi was out of Britain, Home Secretary Theresa May used a little-known power – which does not require a court order – to deprive him of all his rights as a British national.
It can also be revealed that Mrs May has issued at least another nine orders against British nationals. The majority have been served on Muslim men, although the most public case is that of Russian spy Anna Chapman, who had been married to a UK national.
The deprivation of citizenship order signed by Mrs May says Mr Hashi has lost his rights to live in the UK because of the ‘public good’.
Mr Hashi has not been told of what he is accused, nor is it clear whether he knows he is no longer a British citizen.
The only justification Mrs May has given for removing Mr Hashi’s citizenship is his alleged involvement in Islamic extremism. But his family say he has never been interested in any kind of extremist behaviour. //
So without any court or any charges, a British Citizen can have their citizenship cancelled on the whim of the Home Secretary. She does not reveal who has been cancelled and does not give any evidence. This is very counter the British Legal system, and of course such wielding of a draconian power should be challdenged in the Courts.
-- answer removed --
Gromit, your first link is from the Mail on Sunday (shock horror!) – and your second states // However almost nothing else is known about the most recent deprivation cases.//
Just goes to show you can’t believe everything the Mail says …. but I thought you knew that. ;o)
//So THEY were taxpayers, until their removal.//
We’re they? What did they do for a living?
Just goes to show you can’t believe everything the Mail says …. but I thought you knew that. ;o)
//So THEY were taxpayers, until their removal.//
We’re they? What did they do for a living?
Naomi ////B00, good question. There seem to be a lot around like that.////
Yes, and for a very simple reason. How many Afghans came here for assylum before Afghanistan was attacked by USA & CO? Not many.
And how many since then? obviously too many. Because if we are saying that taliban ar ekilling people then what is wrong in few thousand afghans in agreeing with us and turning up here. easy assylum as we are the ones who said that in the first place and they are only agreeing with us. Another story is that soon after getting a british passport all these people catch first available flight to go and visit the same place that they said was dangerous for them.
Yes, and for a very simple reason. How many Afghans came here for assylum before Afghanistan was attacked by USA & CO? Not many.
And how many since then? obviously too many. Because if we are saying that taliban ar ekilling people then what is wrong in few thousand afghans in agreeing with us and turning up here. easy assylum as we are the ones who said that in the first place and they are only agreeing with us. Another story is that soon after getting a british passport all these people catch first available flight to go and visit the same place that they said was dangerous for them.
OK, I'll just put it a different way then:
The reason he isn't a British citizen is as a result of the action he is questioning. That fact alone seems reasonable enough to me. Otherwise it's an unfair Catch 22 sort of situation.
Unfortunately because we know nothing about him it's very hard to comment further.
The reason he isn't a British citizen is as a result of the action he is questioning. That fact alone seems reasonable enough to me. Otherwise it's an unfair Catch 22 sort of situation.
Unfortunately because we know nothing about him it's very hard to comment further.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.