ChatterBank0 min ago
At Least Some Good Has Come Out Of This Sorry Affair.
92 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is evident where the DMs sympathies lie. Interesting though it might be, what does the background of the parents have to do with the merits of this dinner ladies dismissal, other than an attempt to elicit more sympathy for the dinner lady?
I think I will defer judgement. She was dismissed for "gross misconduct" wasnt she, and a simple error as described in the original story does not appear to qualify for that.If so, I would have expected her to appeal against the decision before now.
I think it likely there is more to her dismissal than this story would suggest.
I think I will defer judgement. She was dismissed for "gross misconduct" wasnt she, and a simple error as described in the original story does not appear to qualify for that.If so, I would have expected her to appeal against the decision before now.
I think it likely there is more to her dismissal than this story would suggest.
LG she was dismissed by the catering company (not he school) for gross misconduct due to 'negligence, carelessness or idleness'. Maybe it is part of their KPIs.
It seems that "[the school had] around 40 pupils with various dietary requirements and it was impossible to keep track of them" and thus unsuitable for the job she was required to do?
I can see that this does seem heavy handed but imagine if she'd given a dish containing nut products (satay sauce) to a kid with extreme nut allergy and going into anaphylactic shock.
It seems that "[the school had] around 40 pupils with various dietary requirements and it was impossible to keep track of them" and thus unsuitable for the job she was required to do?
I can see that this does seem heavy handed but imagine if she'd given a dish containing nut products (satay sauce) to a kid with extreme nut allergy and going into anaphylactic shock.
As quoted in the mail "Miss Waldock said the pupil had actually asked for the meat. ‘I asked, “Do you want the gammon?” and she said yes, so I served it to her,’ she said."
Zahid and Rumana Darr asked for Alison Waldock to be dismissed!
Miss Waldock accidentally served pork, forbidden by Islam, to their daughter!
am i missing something here?? the girl asked for it!
Zahid and Rumana Darr asked for Alison Waldock to be dismissed!
Miss Waldock accidentally served pork, forbidden by Islam, to their daughter!
am i missing something here?? the girl asked for it!
jno
/// you don't know the history of this woman, emmie, and the Mail isn't about to tell you, so best to wait and see what comes from more reliable
sources. ///
Perhaps it was the dinner lady who blew the whistle on him? :0)
*** The nine-year ban was imposed in February 2011 but in May this year he was found to be operating a similar company named Interecruit (GB), which supplied agricultural workers. ***
/// you don't know the history of this woman, emmie, and the Mail isn't about to tell you, so best to wait and see what comes from more reliable
sources. ///
Perhaps it was the dinner lady who blew the whistle on him? :0)
*** The nine-year ban was imposed in February 2011 but in May this year he was found to be operating a similar company named Interecruit (GB), which supplied agricultural workers. ***
Octavius, on an earlier thread on this subject, someone posted a link to the original story in a local newspaper. In this, the company said it wasn't their practice to sack anyone for a single mistake.
This suggests it might not have been an isolated incident. Unfortunately the Mail didn't print this, probably to leave it more room for photos of Rihanna's new haircut, so we may never know.
This suggests it might not have been an isolated incident. Unfortunately the Mail didn't print this, probably to leave it more room for photos of Rihanna's new haircut, so we may never know.
The idea that "common sense has gone out of the window" can only apply if you believe that this dinner lady was sacked for gross negligence by the company employing her following this single incident over what was described as a genuine mistake.
I seriously doubt that this was the reason for her dismissal; The company themselves have indicated as much. Should she elect to appeal, we may learn more.
Until then, I would reserve judgement, and would agree with Octavius and Jno that her dismissal is not simply based upon the incident described in the DM.
I seriously doubt that this was the reason for her dismissal; The company themselves have indicated as much. Should she elect to appeal, we may learn more.
Until then, I would reserve judgement, and would agree with Octavius and Jno that her dismissal is not simply based upon the incident described in the DM.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.