Would Wild Birds Eat Grapes If They Were...
Home & Garden6 mins ago
John Kerry Is Now Telling Us In Gruesome Detail About The Chemical Weapons Attack
Or is he just a very good liar?
So far he hasn't mentioned the issue of the vote in the UK parliament last night.
Does anyone opposed - for perfectly respectable reasons - to Britain's involvement in any response have a problem with the US and France acting oerhaps alone?
So far he hasn't mentioned the issue of the vote in the UK parliament last night.
Does anyone opposed - for perfectly respectable reasons - to Britain's involvement in any response have a problem with the US and France acting oerhaps alone?
Answers
IMHO people have lost sight of what this mission will be, particularly the British public. Obama has no desire whatsoever to get embroiled in a long-
08:38 Sat 31st Aug 2013
Sorry not yet. He's just finished speaking. He said that 1429 civilians were killed, over 400 of them children. The US 'knows' that the Assad govt did it, where the attack started, where it was directed, and that they had intercepted concerns from a high-ranking regime member worrying about how they might cover up the tracks of what they had done
Like Sqad, I'm not quite sure what you mean icheria. Of course he isn't lying. What ever we think about what must be done, the facts of the chemical attack is not disputed. It did happen.
Our Parliament have given their verdict and decided to stand by and let Assad get away with this. But others, like France and the US are taking a different stance...democracy in motion I would have thought, a concept that Assad The Butcher doesn't understand.
Our Parliament have given their verdict and decided to stand by and let Assad get away with this. But others, like France and the US are taking a different stance...democracy in motion I would have thought, a concept that Assad The Butcher doesn't understand.
"I wonder if DC hadnt rushed in and recalled parliament, and following john Kerry's speech tonight, if the vote would have been different on Monday, when the commons would be back from their hols ? "
Yes I wonder too. The whole thing was badly rushed.
mikey, I'm sorry you don't understand the question: I didn't think it was all that difficult to understand, tho perhaps less easy to answer: I'm not sure of my own responsxe. The other stuff about "is John Kerry lying" etc - that was meant to be a rhetorical question but it doesn't come over too well in typed words. But a lot of people were asking for absolute proof. This is it, it would seem: unless of course you think Kerry is lying, which was my point.
I will be interested to see what the "obstructionist" Russians make of this.
Yes I wonder too. The whole thing was badly rushed.
mikey, I'm sorry you don't understand the question: I didn't think it was all that difficult to understand, tho perhaps less easy to answer: I'm not sure of my own responsxe. The other stuff about "is John Kerry lying" etc - that was meant to be a rhetorical question but it doesn't come over too well in typed words. But a lot of people were asking for absolute proof. This is it, it would seem: unless of course you think Kerry is lying, which was my point.
I will be interested to see what the "obstructionist" Russians make of this.
Cameron was the chief cheerleader that was pushing for war. The US was supposed to reluctantly join the call to partner their British ally. Unfortunately Cameron had his wings clipped so the administration have to sell it to the American public directly.
When in the summer that it was evident that the rebels were going to lose, a decission for the west to intervene on their side became inevitable. The US, British, Turkey and the French have been building up their navys and men in the region for several weeks.
When they were ready to go, by a strange coincidence, Assad used chemical weapons, therefore providing the started trigger for the war to start.
The US, France and Turkey are welcome to fight this one without us. Unfortunately, when they want the UN to go in and hold the peace, guess who will be first in the queue to send our troops?
When in the summer that it was evident that the rebels were going to lose, a decission for the west to intervene on their side became inevitable. The US, British, Turkey and the French have been building up their navys and men in the region for several weeks.
When they were ready to go, by a strange coincidence, Assad used chemical weapons, therefore providing the started trigger for the war to start.
The US, France and Turkey are welcome to fight this one without us. Unfortunately, when they want the UN to go in and hold the peace, guess who will be first in the queue to send our troops?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.