ChatterBank0 min ago
Woman To Be Freed After Only 2-3 Months In Jail.
100 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-birmi ngham-2 3950394
Is 2-3 months in jail a satisfactory punishment for causing "catastrophic" brain injuries to one's child?.
Is 2-3 months in jail a satisfactory punishment for causing "catastrophic" brain injuries to one's child?.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.slaney
/// It is a of course a tragedy that the infant suffered such horrendous injuries, and the mother will surely suffer from the knowledge that she inflicted them for the rest of her life. ///
And you know that for certain, you are obviously assuming this as a mentally balanced person, who knows what attitude towards her action this woman will take?
/// It is a of course a tragedy that the infant suffered such horrendous injuries, and the mother will surely suffer from the knowledge that she inflicted them for the rest of her life. ///
And you know that for certain, you are obviously assuming this as a mentally balanced person, who knows what attitude towards her action this woman will take?
andy-hughes
/// AOG, you seem determined to see attacks and twists where none exist - certainly as far as i am concerned. ///
Wasn't it you who first did exactly what you are now denying? so much so that you were criticised by this poster (who you know is not generally on my side) for doing so.
*** To be fair to AOG, he has just asked the question, he has not said what he thinks. ***
/// so I will excuse myself from here, and see you on another thread another time. ///
That's it Andy retire when the damage has been done.
/// AOG, you seem determined to see attacks and twists where none exist - certainly as far as i am concerned. ///
Wasn't it you who first did exactly what you are now denying? so much so that you were criticised by this poster (who you know is not generally on my side) for doing so.
*** To be fair to AOG, he has just asked the question, he has not said what he thinks. ***
/// so I will excuse myself from here, and see you on another thread another time. ///
That's it Andy retire when the damage has been done.
AOG
\\\\\And you know that for certain, you are obviously assuming this as a mentally balanced person, who knows what attitude towards her action this woman will take? \\\
This is the basis of the legal argument......she is NOT or for a short period of time, a mentally balanced person....it being accepted that she was mentally imbalanced to cause her to dispose of her child.
So, as you say.....who knows what psychological trauma the woman may suffer?......or not.
\\\\\And you know that for certain, you are obviously assuming this as a mentally balanced person, who knows what attitude towards her action this woman will take? \\\
This is the basis of the legal argument......she is NOT or for a short period of time, a mentally balanced person....it being accepted that she was mentally imbalanced to cause her to dispose of her child.
So, as you say.....who knows what psychological trauma the woman may suffer?......or not.
AOG - first of all thank you for highlighting this case. I had wrongly presumed that a crime committed in these circumstances would not bring a custodial sentence.
The judge in the original trial - Judge Kate Thirlwall - said: "You have expressed your remorse and I accept it is genuine." I was presuming that the mother still feels this remorse.
The judge in the original trial - Judge Kate Thirlwall - said: "You have expressed your remorse and I accept it is genuine." I was presuming that the mother still feels this remorse.
andy-hughes presumed (rightly) that you didn't think the sentence was long enough. You have since confirmed that you do indeed think the sentence was too short.
Then you referred to andy's post as
// the spin that Andy-Hughes tried to put on my words //
and then
// (Andy) retire when the damage has been done. //
There has been no damage done.
There was no spin to change the meaning of what you intended.
And posts like
// I do pity those who seem to take a delight in trying to belittle others, so as to cover up their own short comings. //
Is inaccurate and deliberately rude and offensive.
Then you referred to andy's post as
// the spin that Andy-Hughes tried to put on my words //
and then
// (Andy) retire when the damage has been done. //
There has been no damage done.
There was no spin to change the meaning of what you intended.
And posts like
// I do pity those who seem to take a delight in trying to belittle others, so as to cover up their own short comings. //
Is inaccurate and deliberately rude and offensive.
Gromit
And posts like
// I do pity those who seem to take a delight in trying to belittle others, so as to cover up their own short comings. //
Is inaccurate and deliberately rude and offensive.
Oh please don't play the 'right guy' and a defender of rightfulness, rudeness and offensiveness.
I would not have to do much of a search to find examples where certain ABers are constantly insisting that they are right and will dish out masses of offensiveness and rudeness against me, yet there are very few who do not or perhaps dare not also criticise them for their actions.
And posts like
// I do pity those who seem to take a delight in trying to belittle others, so as to cover up their own short comings. //
Is inaccurate and deliberately rude and offensive.
Oh please don't play the 'right guy' and a defender of rightfulness, rudeness and offensiveness.
I would not have to do much of a search to find examples where certain ABers are constantly insisting that they are right and will dish out masses of offensiveness and rudeness against me, yet there are very few who do not or perhaps dare not also criticise them for their actions.
Seems it is a little more persistent than I thought.........
http:// vanderc ookpres s.info/ vanderb log/wp- content /upload s/2007/ 07/3in1 -p_fami ly.gif
http://
// ...certain ABers... will dish out masses of offensiveness and rudeness against me //
AOG, just an observation, and I am sure you will not agree, but you do seem to have a persecution complex. Your posts generate lively debates, but you should not take it personally if people disagree with you.
This thread is a good example. The majority of people agree with the Appeal Court judges and disagree with you. That does not mean we are being rude or offensive to you. We are entitled to our view just as much you are yours.
AOG, just an observation, and I am sure you will not agree, but you do seem to have a persecution complex. Your posts generate lively debates, but you should not take it personally if people disagree with you.
This thread is a good example. The majority of people agree with the Appeal Court judges and disagree with you. That does not mean we are being rude or offensive to you. We are entitled to our view just as much you are yours.
EcclesCake
/// I was taught that offence is taken not given........///
Who taught you that Ricky Gervais? .
He said, “offence is not given it’s taken.”
But a Telegraph Headline, stated:
/// Freedom of speech means being free to give offence ///
Also Collins definition
http:// www.col linsdic tionary .com/di ctionar y/engli sh/give -offenc e
/// I was taught that offence is taken not given........///
Who taught you that Ricky Gervais? .
He said, “offence is not given it’s taken.”
But a Telegraph Headline, stated:
/// Freedom of speech means being free to give offence ///
Also Collins definition
http://
Gromit
/// AOG, just an observation, and I am sure you will not agree, but you do seem to have a persecution complex. Your posts generate lively debates, but you should not take it personally if people disagree with you. ///
I do not expect people to agree with me but I do expect them to be civil towards me, and refrain from insulting me, accusing me of being racist, homophobic, bigoted etc, etc and turning my words into things I have not said.
/// This thread is a good example. The majority of people agree with the Appeal Court judges and disagree with you. That does not mean we are being rude or offensive to you. We are entitled to our view just as much you are yours. ///
And it was not their opinions I disagreed with, I simply took offence with certain persons trying to read into my thread more than what I actually said, and this included the fact that no one addressed my actual question, which I won't bother to copy and paste yet again because it is there for everyone to read, and of course the matter of the head covering of the woman, yet one more accusation of racism where none exists.
/// AOG, just an observation, and I am sure you will not agree, but you do seem to have a persecution complex. Your posts generate lively debates, but you should not take it personally if people disagree with you. ///
I do not expect people to agree with me but I do expect them to be civil towards me, and refrain from insulting me, accusing me of being racist, homophobic, bigoted etc, etc and turning my words into things I have not said.
/// This thread is a good example. The majority of people agree with the Appeal Court judges and disagree with you. That does not mean we are being rude or offensive to you. We are entitled to our view just as much you are yours. ///
And it was not their opinions I disagreed with, I simply took offence with certain persons trying to read into my thread more than what I actually said, and this included the fact that no one addressed my actual question, which I won't bother to copy and paste yet again because it is there for everyone to read, and of course the matter of the head covering of the woman, yet one more accusation of racism where none exists.
I know you and andy have previous, but I fail to see what 'damage' he did to you or how those were rude and offensive.
// no one addressed my actual question //
Many people addressed your question in the early postings on this thread, me included. We (many) believe the sentence was too long or should never have been brought, and said so. It may not have been the answer you wanted, but we cannot be accused of not answering it.
// no one addressed my actual question //
Many people addressed your question in the early postings on this thread, me included. We (many) believe the sentence was too long or should never have been brought, and said so. It may not have been the answer you wanted, but we cannot be accused of not answering it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.