Motoring67 mins ago
Truth Is Starting To Leak Out About The Small Mummified Boy.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-leeds -241756 39
Apparently the Police were warned about this horrible Mother but he still died...echoes of Daniel Pelka here ?
Apparently the Police were warned about this horrible Mother but he still died...echoes of Daniel Pelka here ?
Answers
EVERYONE surrounding this little boy let him down, including his 22 year old brother who saw evidence with his own eyes of severe neglect but did nothing.
15:14 Fri 20th Sep 2013
I don't believe that's entirely true B00.
The text used in the link attributed to the father is obviously a transcript from his tape recorded interview. He expressed genuine concern for his child and asked for a Doctor to attend his son, in regards to his physical state.
Furthermore, he gave Police details of the domestic circumstances in which his child was being kept i.e. a mother succumbing to alcoholism.
He did what he could IMHO.
The text used in the link attributed to the father is obviously a transcript from his tape recorded interview. He expressed genuine concern for his child and asked for a Doctor to attend his son, in regards to his physical state.
Furthermore, he gave Police details of the domestic circumstances in which his child was being kept i.e. a mother succumbing to alcoholism.
He did what he could IMHO.
I didn't say he was a hero pixie, I just pointed out that he made circumstances known to the Police and asked for a Doctor to examine his child.
As for removing the child B00, how was he supposed to do that? Unfortunately in this case he was in all probability given to the mother to provide custody. It's fairly well known what happens to fathers who remove or attemp to remove a child from the parent who is granted custody.
Some are losing sight of the fact that the mother is on trial here, not the father.
As for removing the child B00, how was he supposed to do that? Unfortunately in this case he was in all probability given to the mother to provide custody. It's fairly well known what happens to fathers who remove or attemp to remove a child from the parent who is granted custody.
Some are losing sight of the fact that the mother is on trial here, not the father.
Perhaps if he'd made more of an effort to physically remove his son, the authorities might have upped their game and started to question why he was so eager to get his son out of there? And in all honesty, if you had a smidgen of doubt regarding the care of your child by your ex, you'd not do a thing Chilldoubt for fear of retribution to yourself? Really?
And Rosetta raises a very good and vaild point- where was he in the 2 years between the tot dieing and being found?
Im not losing sight of the fact it's the mother who's on trial here, she has to face the consequences, but I still feel the rest of the child's relatives (elder son included) must also be held accountable.
And Rosetta raises a very good and vaild point- where was he in the 2 years between the tot dieing and being found?
Im not losing sight of the fact it's the mother who's on trial here, she has to face the consequences, but I still feel the rest of the child's relatives (elder son included) must also be held accountable.
Perhaps if he'd made more of an effort to physically remove his son, the authorities might have upped their game and started to question why he was so eager to get his son out of there? And in all honesty, if you had a smidgen of doubt regarding the care of your child by your ex, you'd not do a thing Chilldoubt for fear of retribution to yourself? Really?
----------------------------
Whilst I wouldn't dream of going into specifics on this forum, you've obviously never been involved in a battle for custody of a child or fought for visitation rights.
Every case is different. The father wanted his child examined by a Doctor and expressed concerns to Police, who failed to act appropriately despite 8 visits to the home of the child. That in itself should have alerted an officer of higher rank and/or Social Services.
All concerned have to look at themselves to one degree or another but to say EVERYONE let him down is too easy a cop-out IMHO.
----------------------------
Whilst I wouldn't dream of going into specifics on this forum, you've obviously never been involved in a battle for custody of a child or fought for visitation rights.
Every case is different. The father wanted his child examined by a Doctor and expressed concerns to Police, who failed to act appropriately despite 8 visits to the home of the child. That in itself should have alerted an officer of higher rank and/or Social Services.
All concerned have to look at themselves to one degree or another but to say EVERYONE let him down is too easy a cop-out IMHO.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.