Jobs & Education0 min ago
New Power Station
28 Answers
What are your views on the government giving the go ahead to building a new power station at Hinkley, part funded by China?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Georgiesmum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
if you knew how badly we need this power station would wouldnt be concerned about the cost,nuclear is the ONLY way to go ,wind turbines would need to cover the whole of the country to give as much power output as the big nuclear one and there only good if there's a wind,ive no concerns about who builds it or owns it
It does concern me that we've agreed to twice the unit cost at present. £16 billion I believe is the estimated cost which probably means it will be £32 billion. Let's hope that we haven't agreed to a cap on the construction costs. On the plus side, it is estimated that the build and running of the plant will create 25,000 new jobs.
Not a word in the BBC's news coverage pertaining to how high above sea level the Hinkley Point site is.
It's about 500 years since the last tsunami-like event hit the area but the Severn estuary is the perfect shape to transform a trifling surge into a serious flood event.
Then there's sea-level rise to wonder about.
It's about 500 years since the last tsunami-like event hit the area but the Severn estuary is the perfect shape to transform a trifling surge into a serious flood event.
Then there's sea-level rise to wonder about.
I think it`s a good thing. There is already a power station there so they won`t be creating an eyesore. The Chinese will foot the bill if it goes over budget, the South West has always been an unemployment blackspot so the creation of 25,000 new jobs is not to be sniffed at and money will be spent in the area (friends of mine with a property on Exmoor decided to rent it out so that they could buy something bigger and better. I thought she would never find a tenant but someone from Hinkley rented it). Anything is better than 240 wind turbines in the Bristol Channel but unfortunately, I doubt the development at Hinkley will make any difference.
Hypo.....judging by the artists impression on the beeb website it's virtually AT sea level
http://
http://
The tab is only massive if the site is reverted to a green field site. In practice the old reactor will be coccooned and the rest of the site used for a new power station. This means that the expensive cooling water culverts can be re-used and the old reactor is contained within a secure site. So in practice it may make the new PS. cheaper than it would have been if it had been built on a green field site.
Zacs, you are correct it is not much above sea level. I used to visit the site regularly for many years and I am quite familiar with it. It is the nature of power stations to at least have their cooling water pumps below sea level:o) Some time ago ( a decade or more) A large and high wall was built to protect the lower parts of the site from a tidal surge. I expect the new station will take into consideration the possibility of a tsunami as there is evidence for them having happened here in the not too distant past.
On the news today they said that by the time the new power station would be built the old power station would be decommissioned, so it is not extra energy we would be getting just replacement. As regards letting the Chinese and the French building it it goes with this government selling off the country by the back door, should someone tell the Queen that her country is disappearing.
