ChatterBank3 mins ago
More Spongers!
27 Answers
http:// www.the times.c o.uk/tt o/news/ uk/crim e/artic le39134 69.ece
Honestly, The Times is getting like the Mail ! Police dogs to get "pensions" indeed! Not quite.
Honestly, The Times is getting like the Mail ! Police dogs to get "pensions" indeed! Not quite.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FredPuli43. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG, I think you have the wrong FredPuli, too. But we know your distorted view of the world, so I accept the remark for what it is. Since when has a committed Tory voter, and former member of the Westminster Conservative Party ( I no longer have a home there), with a now, ex, wife who is on the A list of Tory candidates and who fought a general election for the Party, been happy when only a communist paper is left? I must say, that takes some imagination, and, I may say, delusional fantasy, but we can judge it for what it is.
I have the misfortune of having paid enough tax,including this year alone, to support a good percentage of the misguided quasi-socialist policies of various governments, but feel free to think of me as a fifth columnist nonetheless. Power to the people !
I have the misfortune of having paid enough tax,including this year alone, to support a good percentage of the misguided quasi-socialist policies of various governments, but feel free to think of me as a fifth columnist nonetheless. Power to the people !
Let us return to our sheep, AOG. The Times made the mistake of putting out a misleading headline: there was no "state pension" proposed for dogs. It was only a proposal that police dogs who incurred veterinary bills should not thereby be a burden on the officers with whom they were living in retirement.
That, as must well know, being an avid and analytical reader of the Daily Mail, is one of that paper's favourite journalistic devices. You. of course, would recognise it for the deception it is, but others do not have your critical skills, any more than you would fail to notice how often the first paragraph is not borne out by the rest of the piece. Others can't be bothered to read that far, it seems, and nor do they go to the sources thereof to discover the sources are being accurately represented.
That The Times put the statement in quotes is good but does not provide the paper with a defence, as was pointed out by numerous readers in the comments section.
That, as must well know, being an avid and analytical reader of the Daily Mail, is one of that paper's favourite journalistic devices. You. of course, would recognise it for the deception it is, but others do not have your critical skills, any more than you would fail to notice how often the first paragraph is not borne out by the rest of the piece. Others can't be bothered to read that far, it seems, and nor do they go to the sources thereof to discover the sources are being accurately represented.
That The Times put the statement in quotes is good but does not provide the paper with a defence, as was pointed out by numerous readers in the comments section.