Thames Water 23 Billion Certainly Sir
ChatterBank0 min ago
12 Years A Slave Gets 10 Bafta Nominations
Who'd have thought it?
Great News for its British Director and Star.
Great News for its British Director and Star.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Chewn
Who would be wound up by the success of a British film?
Personally, I would be more wound up by 'Gravity' sweeping the board (dull, dull, dull).
Anyway, perhaps we should allow the AB Editor to decide whether this thread should be moved from the new section...I don't think any of the rest of us have the authority to make such decisions.
Who would be wound up by the success of a British film?
Personally, I would be more wound up by 'Gravity' sweeping the board (dull, dull, dull).
Anyway, perhaps we should allow the AB Editor to decide whether this thread should be moved from the new section...I don't think any of the rest of us have the authority to make such decisions.
-- answer removed --
Mrsspagnoli57
/// What's matter AOG-wasn't this in the Daily Mail then?? ///
Yes something was, but even more of a news story, but even that was reported under TV & Showbiz.
http://
This from the Guardian for the more sensitive amongst us.
/// As a Bafta voter for many years I can reveal that the voting process is based less on artistic merit than on a combination of coercion, trend-following and pot luck," the writer suggests. "Let's be clear. Bafta voting guidelines state explicitly that you must only vote for films you have seen. Which makes perfect sense. But I've done it. And I bet everyone else has, too. You vote for the ones you think are going to win. ///
/// "We're sheep. And we follow the sheep in front of us. The days are still ticking by, and you still have all these films to watch, and you've been meaning to get to them but you can't, and there are all these obvious front-runners … ///
http://
/// What's matter AOG-wasn't this in the Daily Mail then?? ///
Yes something was, but even more of a news story, but even that was reported under TV & Showbiz.
http://
This from the Guardian for the more sensitive amongst us.
/// As a Bafta voter for many years I can reveal that the voting process is based less on artistic merit than on a combination of coercion, trend-following and pot luck," the writer suggests. "Let's be clear. Bafta voting guidelines state explicitly that you must only vote for films you have seen. Which makes perfect sense. But I've done it. And I bet everyone else has, too. You vote for the ones you think are going to win. ///
/// "We're sheep. And we follow the sheep in front of us. The days are still ticking by, and you still have all these films to watch, and you've been meaning to get to them but you can't, and there are all these obvious front-runners … ///
http://
-- answer removed --
boxtops
/// It's news, it's in the papers and on the TV news. Does it matter where it is? - it's being discussed. ///
If you have had your perfectly valid questions labelled 'Non-news stories' (especially by the OP) as many times as I have, you would understand why I was so quick to retaliate in the way I did.
Thet say, "What goes around comes around", one only has to wait.
/// It's news, it's in the papers and on the TV news. Does it matter where it is? - it's being discussed. ///
If you have had your perfectly valid questions labelled 'Non-news stories' (especially by the OP) as many times as I have, you would understand why I was so quick to retaliate in the way I did.
Thet say, "What goes around comes around", one only has to wait.
Perhaps we may see such 'news stories' as these littering up the News Section in the future, unless an end is put to these matters now?
http://
http://
http://
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.