Quizzes & Puzzles45 mins ago
Amanda Knox Verdict Overturned
Knox & Sollecito found guilty but Knox is in the US so how does that
change anything!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by toalisi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.andy-hughes
While I agree with your sentiments regarding the Daily Mail's choice of words, I noticed that you decided to get in a dig at the Daily Mail, rather than some comments that have been entered on here, such as the one below.
/// That woman has always looked sooooo guilty. Face like a slapped arse all the way through the trial, showed no emotion. I sincerely hope she gets her come uppance one way or the other! ///
I only hope that the person who put this isn't ever instructed to attend jury duty in this country.
While I agree with your sentiments regarding the Daily Mail's choice of words, I noticed that you decided to get in a dig at the Daily Mail, rather than some comments that have been entered on here, such as the one below.
/// That woman has always looked sooooo guilty. Face like a slapped arse all the way through the trial, showed no emotion. I sincerely hope she gets her come uppance one way or the other! ///
I only hope that the person who put this isn't ever instructed to attend jury duty in this country.
AOG - "I noticed that you decided to get in a dig at the Daily Mail, rather than some comments that have been entered on here, such as the one below."
I did not 'get a dig at the Daily Mail ...' at the expense of commenting on other posts - I agree that some of the posts on here regarding Ms Knox as guilty simply on the basis of her percieved manner through media coverage are far from ideal, but everyone is entitlted to their viewpoint.
The views of one individual expressed on one website is a far cry from a national newespaper writing its headlines and using a facile nickname in such a serious piece of news - and that is my point.
It is not a 'dig' at the Daily Mail, it is an observation that in my opinion, their willingness to take a serious news item as seriously as it deserves is not apparent, and in my view, that stance is inappropriate.
I did not 'get a dig at the Daily Mail ...' at the expense of commenting on other posts - I agree that some of the posts on here regarding Ms Knox as guilty simply on the basis of her percieved manner through media coverage are far from ideal, but everyone is entitlted to their viewpoint.
The views of one individual expressed on one website is a far cry from a national newespaper writing its headlines and using a facile nickname in such a serious piece of news - and that is my point.
It is not a 'dig' at the Daily Mail, it is an observation that in my opinion, their willingness to take a serious news item as seriously as it deserves is not apparent, and in my view, that stance is inappropriate.
// It is not a 'dig' at the Daily Mail, it is an observation that in my opinion, their willingness to take a serious news item as seriously as it deserves is not apparent, and in my view, that stance is inappropriate //
I agree. I'm sure they'd like to think they're a step up from the Sun or the Daily Sport. If so they need to work a bit harder at convincing us they are.
I agree. I'm sure they'd like to think they're a step up from the Sun or the Daily Sport. If so they need to work a bit harder at convincing us they are.