Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 60 of 69rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The most disturbing thing is that, if politicians like Putin say such things, it must mean that they gauge those things as popular in the country. And the laws must have some appeal too.

Would that approach work in the UK ? No, not now. There will always be some to whom it would appeal, but they are surely in a diminishing minority
Since when have politicians in this country correctly gauged the opinions of the people?
Since the days of the first successful election slogan, Daisy.
And after being elected they don't care a fig.
Back in 2010 didn't Seb Blatter warn Homosexuals to stay away from Qatar 2022?

Did he? That sounds unlikely, I must say (and I am not a Coe fan). Got a link?
jno

No, you're right. He didn't.

A quick search on Google reveals what he actually said.

The same quick search might also reveal to those that think that the Qatar attitude both socially, and legally, wasn't a big news story when they were awarded the World Cup, to be bogus.
Question Author
This is what Putin said:

/// Russian President Vladimir Putin said in October that everything was being done "so that participants and guests feel comfortable in Sochi, regardless of nationality, race or sexual orientation".///

http://www.aljazeera.com/sport/olympics/2013/12/ioc-under-fire-over-gay-athletes-stance-2013121191322203416.html

And this is what Blatter said:

/// Blatter was heavily criticized for saying they should "refrain from sexual activity" if they go to Qatar because homosexuality is illegal in the emirate. ///

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SPORT/football/12/17/world.cup.qatar.blatter.gays/
If Qatar is so ghastly, I am not sure why we are holding the World Cup there in the first place. Its also going to far too hot to play football, so, again, complete incomprehension about what it was chosen.

It wouldn't be all about money and not football of course, would it ?
Question Author
sp1814

/// How do you know what he was thinking? We can only go by what he said. He did not mention propaganda. He simply said, "Leave our kids alone". ///

*** Putin's "homosexual propaganda" legislation, which bans the promotion of "non-traditional sexual relations" among minors, ***

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/frank-mugisha-homophobia-is-not-african-its-imported-9117077.html
AOG

What point are you making?
Question Author
sp1814

/// What point are you making? ///

The fact that I have said before, Putin's law and concerns is all about gay propaganda.aimed at minors, not sexual actions towards them, as I think you are suggesting, by the "Leave our kids alone" remark.
AOG seems like both you and I are deemed by sp to talk nonsense - while I respect sp and his views, it appears this is not a two way street, he resorts to the "putting down" method. SP I was going to ignore your unwarranted remark to me (not that I am bothered by it ) but you have to respect other peoples views (do I sound like your mum). By the way, I consider you a gay activist on this site.
well, good grief, I managed to confuse two Sebs. It was late, of course. Still, stupid of me. Anyway, Blatter didn't say exactly that but what he did say was none too classy.
Question Author
Brenden

Yes I am afraid that all these so called minority groups do nothing to foster understanding, due to their refusal to accept that some outside their particular groups may have hold some different opinions to themselves.
No AOG

The law bans the promotion of homosexuality to minors. However, the new law has been written with such vague language (ie. what is 'promotion' it is now illegal to hold any sort of public demonstration in favour of gay rights, speak in defence of gay rights and distribute material related to gay rights, or to state that gay relationships are equal to heterosexual relationships.

In order to enact that, the smokescreen of 'distributing to minors' has been erected.

The results of this can now be seen across Russia, where it has become more dangerous to be gay, because their President is trotting out the old line that gays are recruiting kids.

That's what it boils down to.

I will say this once again - the wording of the law is criminalising gay people.
Question Author
sp1814

/// The results of this can now be seen across Russia, where it has become more dangerous to be gay, because their President is trotting out the old line that gays are recruiting kids. ///

Among that legislation I still cannot see proof where Putin has suggested that gays are recruiting kids.

Perhaps you would care to provide that proof?
AOG

Exactly!

That's how vague the wording is.

I can interpret it one way, and someone else can interpret it another.

The undeniable fact is that this law has introduced a framework to allow interpretation, and the Russian authorities have taken it to mean that the 'distribution of propaganda' can mean speaking out in favour of gay rights at any time, anywhere - even if there are no minors around.

Do you think that's a good thing?


By the way - have you watched 'Hunted'? Just to see what impact these laws have had?
AOG

Just recalled something you wrote yesterday.

"he is referring to the possibility that their propaganda may sway their sexuality"

But today you write:

"Among that legislation I still cannot see proof where Putin has suggested that gays are recruiting kids."

Which seems like a contradiction.

Also, you write:

"Yes I am afraid that all these so called minority groups do nothing to foster understanding, due to their refusal to accept that some outside their particular groups may have hold some different opinions to themselves."

AOG...I would really like you to understand that a) gay people are a minority group rather than a 'so called minority group' and b) minorities should not accept opinions that to against the idea of equality.

If, for instance, someone says that gay relationships should not be recognised by the state, very few gay people will accept that. And loads more straight people will agree. What certain people don't understand is that their views are on the wane, and that younger people increasingly reject the idea that being gay is 'wrong' simply because they have gay friends, gay relatives and gay colleagues.
Brenden

You said that gay activists are attacking Claire Balding.

This is nonsense.

41 to 60 of 69rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Taking Into Consideration Russia's Attitude Towards Lgbt Community, Should Claire Balding Have Stayed Away?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.