don't know what to say, punch someone in anger, and the man hits his head on the ground. He won't serve that long..
from your link
Gill, who was jailed for four years after admitting manslaughter at Salisbury Crown Court last Friday, was also sentenced to two three-month prison terms to run consecutively after committing the crime while on a suspended sentence for robbery and for handling stolen goods.
That may be so afterwards, but if you play the clip, there is a woman with the cyclist and friend, and they all simply stroll off as though nothing has happened.
I don't see why the value of Mr Young's life should be determined by the sentence given to the man whose actions brought about his death?
/why can't such savages be made more of an example of?/
what does 'make an example of' actually mean? Is it an additionally punitive sentence over and above what the law says is appropriate for the offence in order to shock potential perpetrators into not doing the same?
There is no evidence that there is any deterrent value in such measures because in most cases people swinging a punch at someone do not expect to cause their death and that perception is unlikely to be altered by occasional distortions of the sentencing policies to satisfy armchair executioners.
zeuhl, however look at the footage, the man who threw the punch, it was full on, not a tap, a shove, but a heavy blow, intended to hurt. The three walk off like nothing has happened. What sentence, well the thug has a suspended sentence hanging over him, for that he gets an extra few months.
Speeding or texting while driving is dangerous driving and there is intent to commit that offence. The unfortunate death may not have been the intended consequence. If the dangerous driving results in a death, how can a suspended sentence be given. Punching someone the intent was not to kill them. The unintended consequence was falling on his head which probably caused the death.