News3 mins ago
British Servicemen Posing With Dead Taliban.
94 Answers
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/mi ddle-ea st/mod- investi gates-p ictures -claimi ng-to-s how-a-b ritish- service man-pos ing-wit h-dead- taliban -fighte rs-9347 699.htm l
Gruesome maybe, but this is an entirely different world to what most of us are accustomed to.
If you had see your comrades killed and mutilated, and your squad had finally dispatched one of the perpetrators, wouldn't you feel like giving the (result) thumbs up?
This is just one more instance of trying to turn those that have to do the dirty work on our behalf, into some kind of social workers. And those who send them out to do this work then can't wait to grab hold of a situation like this to try and prove to the rest of the world that "our troops don't behave in such a manner, and we take it very seriously if they do".
WHY?????????
Gruesome maybe, but this is an entirely different world to what most of us are accustomed to.
If you had see your comrades killed and mutilated, and your squad had finally dispatched one of the perpetrators, wouldn't you feel like giving the (result) thumbs up?
This is just one more instance of trying to turn those that have to do the dirty work on our behalf, into some kind of social workers. And those who send them out to do this work then can't wait to grab hold of a situation like this to try and prove to the rest of the world that "our troops don't behave in such a manner, and we take it very seriously if they do".
WHY?????????
Answers
Oh you wonderful AB armchair warriors ready to leap down the throat of Tommy Atkins.Sit back and view the scenario from a wider picture. At the time of the event an unknown number of enemy insurgents enter, through stealth,a large military complex containing men and material.The insurgents are wearing the uniforms of our allies( stolen American...
13:43 Sat 10th May 2014
Baldric
/// As a 62 year old who has spent almost a third of my life as a Royal Marine, I can assure you that any [i]confident / competent[i] person trained in one to one situations could have dealt with that Lad!
12:00 Thu 01st May 2014 ///
62 years old = Born 1952
/// spent almost a third of my life as a Royal Marine, ///
One third of 62 = around 20 years.
Where have I gone wrong Baldric?
/// As a 62 year old who has spent almost a third of my life as a Royal Marine, I can assure you that any [i]confident / competent[i] person trained in one to one situations could have dealt with that Lad!
12:00 Thu 01st May 2014 ///
62 years old = Born 1952
/// spent almost a third of my life as a Royal Marine, ///
One third of 62 = around 20 years.
Where have I gone wrong Baldric?
To Peter Pendant.
That post was not a fairy tale.It was describing a possible scenario.Have you ever attended magistrates or Crown courts and heard the wonderful Jackanorys a defence brief has submitted?Remember there are two sides to a story.That is why we have judicial tribunals and enquiries to establish the truth.It is NOT for ABers to condemn the actions of troops from the comfort of their arm chairs.
A man is still innocent until proven guilty even in military law.
You hit the nail on the head.What better evidence for a defence is an identifiable photograph denoting a justifiable shooting of an insurgent wearing a "friendly uniform"? You may or may not know that it is S.O.P. in the Afghan theatre of war to identify,if possible,any dead or wounded combatants.What is wrong with that?Use a camera not a kukri as a Ghurka did last year and brought the head home as ID.Now that was extreme and certainly worthy of comment BUT after the court of enquiry and not by the likes of you and others who need to get into the real,sometimes unpalatable, world.
That post was not a fairy tale.It was describing a possible scenario.Have you ever attended magistrates or Crown courts and heard the wonderful Jackanorys a defence brief has submitted?Remember there are two sides to a story.That is why we have judicial tribunals and enquiries to establish the truth.It is NOT for ABers to condemn the actions of troops from the comfort of their arm chairs.
A man is still innocent until proven guilty even in military law.
You hit the nail on the head.What better evidence for a defence is an identifiable photograph denoting a justifiable shooting of an insurgent wearing a "friendly uniform"? You may or may not know that it is S.O.P. in the Afghan theatre of war to identify,if possible,any dead or wounded combatants.What is wrong with that?Use a camera not a kukri as a Ghurka did last year and brought the head home as ID.Now that was extreme and certainly worthy of comment BUT after the court of enquiry and not by the likes of you and others who need to get into the real,sometimes unpalatable, world.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.