News1 min ago
You Would Think That A Former Scientific Researcher Would Have Some Common Sense
> he didn't want any wildlife living in the area <
but buys a place with a load of land
>he put the poison near a public right of way <
http:// www.man cunianm atters. co.uk/c ontent/ 0206692 09-ex-m anchest er-uni- researc her-fin ed-%C2% A32500- killing -neighb ours-ca t-cockt ail-rat
but buys a place with a load of land
>he put the poison near a public right of way <
http://
Answers
I am not an 'angry person' but I would feel the need to hurt that guy if he did that to my cat. It was a pretty obvious outcome ~ cats and dogs are scavengers and just wouldn't be able to let a tasty morsel go uneaten. I would prefer to think that he was just a moron who didn't think things through than a callous b... who was willing to inflict a painful death on a harmless...
17:59 Tue 03rd Jun 2014
I am not an 'angry person' but I would feel the need to hurt that guy if he did that to my cat.
It was a pretty obvious outcome ~ cats and dogs are scavengers and just wouldn't be able to let a tasty morsel go uneaten.
I would prefer to think that he was just a moron who didn't think things through than a callous b... who was willing to inflict a painful death on a harmless creature.
I know that many people do not like cats (and I can understand their reasons) but I don't know (I hope) anyone who would harm any animal in such a way.
It was a pretty obvious outcome ~ cats and dogs are scavengers and just wouldn't be able to let a tasty morsel go uneaten.
I would prefer to think that he was just a moron who didn't think things through than a callous b... who was willing to inflict a painful death on a harmless creature.
I know that many people do not like cats (and I can understand their reasons) but I don't know (I hope) anyone who would harm any animal in such a way.
-- answer removed --
it seems to be agreed there were no kids living nearby. Whatever the risks to wildlife, nothing happened to any of it. But he didn't think of the neighbours' cats. That's regrettable but I don't think it's a hanging offence.
On a public right of way would be dangerous. "Near" a public right of way just means "on his own land". I'm inclined to think you should be able to do pretty much what you like with your own land, including trying to kill rats, even if - like this guy - you're clearly living in the wrong sort of place.
On a public right of way would be dangerous. "Near" a public right of way just means "on his own land". I'm inclined to think you should be able to do pretty much what you like with your own land, including trying to kill rats, even if - like this guy - you're clearly living in the wrong sort of place.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.