A little unfair to comment on the relative attractiveness of female politicians when our make MPs are so comprehensively grim.
And another thing - we all say that ministers should be chosen for their ability rather than to tick boxes.
But why isn't this ever said when male ministers are chosen?
Why is it that when a man fails, no-one ever comments on him being promoted above his ability? His sex is irrelevant...but if a woman minister fails, the usual suspects will immediately tie it to her being a woman..."Well, that's the result of positive discrimination".
Has Nick Clegg done an amazing job?
What about David Cameron? Ed Balls? George Osborne? Ed Milliband?
Are these all political titans?
If not - then what kind of positive discrimination can be blamed for them occupying high office?