Let me draw a, not irrelevant, analogy between the Palestinian situation and one of the arguments being used by the SNP in current referendum 'debate'.
The SNP use Toryphobia in Scotland as a free-thinker's suicide pill argument for independence. They (the Tories) 'imposed' the 'infamous' Poll Tax on the Scots before the English.
My mother, a widow living in Edinburgh was £1,100 better off. All over the UK as it was expanded many people were better off. However the people who had never before been asked to contribute to the society that they had depended on for their lives didn't like it, and those with more time to make more noise than the many that benefited from it won the argument.
It was not unreasonably and genuinely thought that the arrival of the incoming Jewish settlers would bring wealth and prosperity to the people of Palestine as those that remained would have to attest to if they had the chance, just as the Conservatives at the time genuinely believed that the introduction of the Poll Tax would be a good thing at that time.
The problem historically is that there was always a powerful coalition of Islamic anti-Semitic factions dedicated to ensuring that the Palestinians were going to be needlessly driven out of their country by anti-Zionist hysteria, when if they had stayed the future of our species would have been enriched, and not driven back into the primordial swamps of depravity it is now mired in.
All I'm saying is that there are two sides to every argument, but the idealists and extremists will only tolerate you if you accept only 50% at most of all the reality that surrounds us. There are at least two sides to every story. When you are forced to accept only one, that is time to reject the propaganda and start learning the actual facts and begin to think for yourself!