Crosswords6 mins ago
Gay Bashing Circa 2014
Seriously...
In 2014, why is this still happening?
And this isn't a 'making a point' thread...I'm genuinely interested in the possible reasons behind this.
Is it religious fundamentalism? Anger at perceived favouritism towards an admittedly small minority? Mental illness? Bravado?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/u k-news/ 2014/au g/28/ma n-jaile d-two-y ears-vi le-viol ent-att ack-out side-lo ndon-cl ub-ammo nia
Again - I'm not making a point, I would like to hear your ideas as to why someone would do this?
I've seen lads having fights in nightclubs, but this is different - any ideas as to why it still happens (and I promise not to shout anyone down - honest).
In 2014, why is this still happening?
And this isn't a 'making a point' thread...I'm genuinely interested in the possible reasons behind this.
Is it religious fundamentalism? Anger at perceived favouritism towards an admittedly small minority? Mental illness? Bravado?
http://
Again - I'm not making a point, I would like to hear your ideas as to why someone would do this?
I've seen lads having fights in nightclubs, but this is different - any ideas as to why it still happens (and I promise not to shout anyone down - honest).
Answers
The 'Goths' name was Sophie Lancaster- there is now a foundation set up in her name encouraging tolerance of all groups of people, and a stage named after her at the Bloodstock Festival. She and her boyfriend were attacked for being , as you say, Goths. Why? Honestly I've no idea except that historically people always attack groups which are dis-similar to...
05:22 Fri 29th Aug 2014
ag
Thank you for some back up on this topic. As I tried to explain to sp in his quest to discover why gays are subject to violence. You open yourself up as gay and flaunt it openly and visit gay pubs/bars you will be declaring yourself as open season for a bout of violence inflicted upon you. Do not flaunt it in non gays faces and flaunt the fact that you are proud to be gay. It ends in tears and I,for one, am not impressed with gay pride marches or having it shoved in my face. I repeat. I would not condone violence towards gays any more than I would fly to the moon to avoid them .
Thank you for some back up on this topic. As I tried to explain to sp in his quest to discover why gays are subject to violence. You open yourself up as gay and flaunt it openly and visit gay pubs/bars you will be declaring yourself as open season for a bout of violence inflicted upon you. Do not flaunt it in non gays faces and flaunt the fact that you are proud to be gay. It ends in tears and I,for one, am not impressed with gay pride marches or having it shoved in my face. I repeat. I would not condone violence towards gays any more than I would fly to the moon to avoid them .
Retro - I thought the Soho bombing pre-dated the N.I ceasefire as I thought it was an Irish atrocity! I then remembered this OP and it made me think.
Copeland was a real extremist whose sentence reflected his deeds.
I know many people share similar views to you especially the Gay Pride marches which are seen as too overt and unnecessary.
Copeland was a real extremist whose sentence reflected his deeds.
I know many people share similar views to you especially the Gay Pride marches which are seen as too overt and unnecessary.
retrocop - "As I tried to explain to sp in his quest to discover why gays are subject to violence. You open yourself up as gay and flaunt it openly and visit gay pubs/bars you will be declaring yourself as open season for a bout of violence inflicted upon you. Do not flaunt it in non gays faces and flaunt the fact that you are proud to be gay. It ends in tears and I,for one, am not impressed with gay pride marches or having it shoved in my face."
Frankly, your antique cromagon bull-headed predjudice took my breath away.
Are you seriously saying that being apparently (and camp behaviour is not more a reliable barometer of homosexuality than muscles is a barometer of steroid abuse) gay leaves men and women open to violence in a manner that suggests you simply think that is the way things are?
That is NOT the way things are! This is 2014, and equality and tolerance for minorities has never been higher, and long may it continue to rise.
The notion that being outwardly gay is to invite violence is an utterly abhorrent concept, and if you do not think that's OK, as you grudgingly aceed at the end of your post, then your acceptance is less than convincing.
If I am in a pub (I rarely am) and a bunch of lagar-swilling louts are singing football songs and generally behaving in a brutish fashion I would simply leave.
I would not decide that my offence at their appearance and behaviour entitles me to visit violence upon them because I don't like their way of enjoying themselves.
Thanks the inherent sensitivity to hostility that most gay people routinely grow up with in our straight society, I would imagine that intolerance radiates from you like a homophobic beacon, and you need have no fear of anyone 'shoving' anything in your face - unless it might be a sarcastic response to your pre-war attitudes.
Learn some respect.
Frankly, your antique cromagon bull-headed predjudice took my breath away.
Are you seriously saying that being apparently (and camp behaviour is not more a reliable barometer of homosexuality than muscles is a barometer of steroid abuse) gay leaves men and women open to violence in a manner that suggests you simply think that is the way things are?
That is NOT the way things are! This is 2014, and equality and tolerance for minorities has never been higher, and long may it continue to rise.
The notion that being outwardly gay is to invite violence is an utterly abhorrent concept, and if you do not think that's OK, as you grudgingly aceed at the end of your post, then your acceptance is less than convincing.
If I am in a pub (I rarely am) and a bunch of lagar-swilling louts are singing football songs and generally behaving in a brutish fashion I would simply leave.
I would not decide that my offence at their appearance and behaviour entitles me to visit violence upon them because I don't like their way of enjoying themselves.
Thanks the inherent sensitivity to hostility that most gay people routinely grow up with in our straight society, I would imagine that intolerance radiates from you like a homophobic beacon, and you need have no fear of anyone 'shoving' anything in your face - unless it might be a sarcastic response to your pre-war attitudes.
Learn some respect.
retrocop
I don't understand how going to a gay bar is somehow 'flaunting it' in the face of non-gays.
In fact, it would seem the very opposite of that.
I suspect that the default position should be that everyone should be able to walk down the street without fear of attack,
There are many things that I find personally unpleasant, but that doesn't give me the right to beat someone up, surely?
I don't understand how going to a gay bar is somehow 'flaunting it' in the face of non-gays.
In fact, it would seem the very opposite of that.
I suspect that the default position should be that everyone should be able to walk down the street without fear of attack,
There are many things that I find personally unpleasant, but that doesn't give me the right to beat someone up, surely?
agchristie
They're a celebration, a party, a place where gay people and their family/friends can publicly give voice to 'other side of the story'...we don't have to look too far to hear those who preach anti-gay messages from the pulpits and from the mosques.
And as retrocop has pointed out, there are vile pieces of filth who genuinely think that it's acceptable to attack and/or kill gay people for no other reason than they're gay.
Pride marches are a way to counter those voices.
Explained quite well here:
http:// www.huf fington post.co m/charl ene-obe rnauer/ whats-t he-poin t-of-pr ide-mar ches_b_ 3462807 .html
They're a celebration, a party, a place where gay people and their family/friends can publicly give voice to 'other side of the story'...we don't have to look too far to hear those who preach anti-gay messages from the pulpits and from the mosques.
And as retrocop has pointed out, there are vile pieces of filth who genuinely think that it's acceptable to attack and/or kill gay people for no other reason than they're gay.
Pride marches are a way to counter those voices.
Explained quite well here:
http://
SP - that's what I thought. Does the LGBT community feel as strongly as it did even just ten years ago? Have these marches really amounted now to just what the description implies - pride and celebration?
To what extent is it 'work in progress'? I've nothing against the marches but from moving matters on, what further progress can be made in the UK?
Is the fear of victimisation greater than the reality of the situation?
To what extent is it 'work in progress'? I've nothing against the marches but from moving matters on, what further progress can be made in the UK?
Is the fear of victimisation greater than the reality of the situation?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.