Film, Media & TV1 min ago
No Jews...
What do you make of this story?
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/home- news/sp orts-di rect-se curity- guard-b anned-j ewish-s choolbo ys-and- told-th em-no-j ews-no- jews-97 35919.h tml
I would be particularly interested to hear the opinion of those who supported the Christian B&B couple who refused a let a room because of their religious convictions.
Were Sports Direct right to sack this security guard?
If so, why?
Me I think is was totally right to remove this guard, as this is *competely* unacceptable.
However, I believe there are some people who think that shops and service providers should have free will...
So...is there anyone who agrees with the actions of this guard?
And if so, why?
http://
I would be particularly interested to hear the opinion of those who supported the Christian B&B couple who refused a let a room because of their religious convictions.
Were Sports Direct right to sack this security guard?
If so, why?
Me I think is was totally right to remove this guard, as this is *competely* unacceptable.
However, I believe there are some people who think that shops and service providers should have free will...
So...is there anyone who agrees with the actions of this guard?
And if so, why?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sp - I think you are missing the point
the guard was acting without authority / ultra vires
following orders is a defence against being fired ( obviously you have to SHOW etc )
If I went into Sportd Direct and someone said no Roman Catholics .....
I would immediately say does your manager know what you are doing ?
but these were kids.....
the guard was acting without authority / ultra vires
following orders is a defence against being fired ( obviously you have to SHOW etc )
If I went into Sportd Direct and someone said no Roman Catholics .....
I would immediately say does your manager know what you are doing ?
but these were kids.....
Firstly, it's obvious that he should have been sacked.
Secondly there's no correlation with the christian B&B incident. They owned that business and as such erroneously believed they could run it exactly how they liked without regard to the laws against discrimination.
They also took that action because of religious beliefs.
This guard was just a paid racist muppet who contravened the policy of his employer.
Secondly there's no correlation with the christian B&B incident. They owned that business and as such erroneously believed they could run it exactly how they liked without regard to the laws against discrimination.
They also took that action because of religious beliefs.
This guard was just a paid racist muppet who contravened the policy of his employer.
Morning Sqad ! I don't think you are missing anything here. It appears that this Security Guard made a decision to bar these children purely based on their religion. There doesn't appear to be any other factors involved. There is no indication that their behaviour was in any way an important factor.
I too would like to hear the Guards story. School children are sometimes not welcome in shops, because of the danger of theft. Its not unusual to see signs on corner shops saying " Only two children allowed at a time"
But his widely reported words, ie "No Jews, no Jews" is rather difficult to understand if he was concerned about shoplifting. Sports Direct stores are a shoplifters dream....very crowded and easy to steal from. They would also attract schoolchildren as the goods on display is their sort of thing.
But there doesn't appear to be any other indications, other than what has already been reported. He allowed some children in but not these two.
But his widely reported words, ie "No Jews, no Jews" is rather difficult to understand if he was concerned about shoplifting. Sports Direct stores are a shoplifters dream....very crowded and easy to steal from. They would also attract schoolchildren as the goods on display is their sort of thing.
But there doesn't appear to be any other indications, other than what has already been reported. He allowed some children in but not these two.