Mikey, //The Labour administration brought in the Minimum wage//
Yes, and they also abolished the 10p rate tax for low paid earners - and they rifled the working man's pension pot. They gave with one hand and took away with the other!
//Richer getting considerably richer and the poor getting considerably poorer.//
Another fallacy. The gap between the rich and poor widened during the years of Labour government.
//There are many reasons why people vote Labour…//
Really? I can think of only one, which is illustrated perfectly by your reference to "Lots of bright young things with red braces on, driving around the M25 in their Porsches". They're living in the past. They cling to the old concept of 'class', purposefully ignoring the fact that many of those bright, young things succeeded in life because they weren't expected to restrict their lives to trundling to the factory every day, but were given the opportunity to succeed. Yours, Mikey, is the politics of envy, which serves only to exacerbate class divide. Labour is not the party of the working man and the sooner the working man realises it, the better off he will be.
As for Farrier's age, I don't do political correctness, so please don't preach it to me. In this instance, if he is indeed only 14, then I attribute his inability to answer a straightforward question to youth. However, as far as this discussion is concerned whether he is 14 or 40, his continual evasion of that question renders him, in my opinion, impotent.