I found it bizarre at the time that Ed Miliband was elected leader. If the 2010 election meant anything for Labour, then for me it meant a rejection of the Brownite side of the party. Blairite Labour won three elections on the bounce, after all, and then Gordon Brown became leader, and apart from a brief surge similar to Clegg's after the first election, things went downhill from there. Perhaps this wasn't entirely Brown's fault, but then it was his chancellorship that led in part at least to the economic crisis...
Anyway, the point is that Brownite Labour never won anything. So why have we ended up in the wake of 2010 with a leader and shadow Chancellor who were Brown's closest allies? Incredible, surprising, and baffling. I'd like to see Ed Miliband stay as leader for another year only in the sense that maybe this time, after a second disastrous defeat, the Labour Party will see that the direction Ed's taking them is completely the wrong one, and revert to something a bit closer to Blairite Labour (ideally without so much of the spin, though.)