ChatterBank4 mins ago
Are Napalm And White Phosphorus Weapons Still Part Of Western Armouries?
Or is the thought of people being burnt to death with such weapons so abhorrent that they've been discarded?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Interesting that the makers and users of such weapons have degrees of sensibility about the seriousness of the death and destruction they deliver.
"Mr President, we think that burning people to death with napalm and white phosphorus is inhumane, so we are reverting back to good old bombs and bullets. The end result is exactly the same, but we feel a little better about it, which is what really matters."
"Mr President, we think that burning people to death with napalm and white phosphorus is inhumane, so we are reverting back to good old bombs and bullets. The end result is exactly the same, but we feel a little better about it, which is what really matters."
And the burnt children were collateral damage?
http:// media.s yracuse .com/ne ws/phot o/2012/ 06/1112 3645-la rge.jpg
http://
-- answer removed --
youngmafbog - "//The end result is exactly the same, but we feel a little better about it, which is what really matters." //
Assuming you mean death as the end result ok, but the way of getting there is totally different. Would you prefer to die by bullet or Napalm? I can't think of many that would choose Napalm"
My point is, the crassness of powers-that-be debating the finer points of destruction of other human beings.
"Would you prefer to die by bullet or Napalm? I can't think of many that would choose Napalm"
I'd prefer not to die violently at all, since you ask!
Assuming you mean death as the end result ok, but the way of getting there is totally different. Would you prefer to die by bullet or Napalm? I can't think of many that would choose Napalm"
My point is, the crassness of powers-that-be debating the finer points of destruction of other human beings.
"Would you prefer to die by bullet or Napalm? I can't think of many that would choose Napalm"
I'd prefer not to die violently at all, since you ask!
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.