How it Works1 min ago
Gunmen Attack At Free Speech Meeting
64 Answers
At Danish cafe where controversial cartoonist was present...
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-eur ope-314 72423
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//I condemn the shootings in Copenhagen. Freespeech must always be protected. My thoughts are with the Danish people. David Cameron//
http:// www.the guardia n.com/w orld/20 15/feb/ 14/cope nhagen- blasphe my-lars -vilks- prophet -muhamm ad-krud ttonden -cafe
As expected.
http://
As expected.
Orderlimit,
Here's another of Murray's offerings...
http:// blogs.s pectato r.co.uk /coffee house/2 015/02/ this-ye ars-win ner-of- the-sim on-hugh es-priz e-is/
Here's another of Murray's offerings...
http://
-- answer removed --
vetuste_ennemi
Thanks for that interesting link, this passage from that Spectator article just about sums it up.
/// Britain flunked the Satanic Verses affair, with politicians of left and right using the opportunity to satisfy their personal animosities against Salman Rushdie (some papers and politicians are still doing so now) and suck up to communal representatives rather than draw a clear line and explain what British traditions were and are. For instance the former Tory home secretary Michael Howard helped nurture the problem for another generation thanks to his bright idea of helping to set up and then governmentally endorse communal Muslim groups in the wake of the Rushdie affair.
It could have gone so much better if at any point since 1989 a political leader of any party had found the guts to say, ‘These are the rules here, and these are our traditions. If you don’t like them then hop it.’ But no one has. And that is why, in 2015, Britain has learnt nothing and progressed nowhere on all this. ///
Thanks for that interesting link, this passage from that Spectator article just about sums it up.
/// Britain flunked the Satanic Verses affair, with politicians of left and right using the opportunity to satisfy their personal animosities against Salman Rushdie (some papers and politicians are still doing so now) and suck up to communal representatives rather than draw a clear line and explain what British traditions were and are. For instance the former Tory home secretary Michael Howard helped nurture the problem for another generation thanks to his bright idea of helping to set up and then governmentally endorse communal Muslim groups in the wake of the Rushdie affair.
It could have gone so much better if at any point since 1989 a political leader of any party had found the guts to say, ‘These are the rules here, and these are our traditions. If you don’t like them then hop it.’ But no one has. And that is why, in 2015, Britain has learnt nothing and progressed nowhere on all this. ///
For heavens sake will some moral retards come along and liven this 'debate ' up for the others :-)
Although there was no question attached to the original post so any 'debate' is presumably meant, as often, to consist of a few outraged opinions which go too far followed by some counter reaction and before you know it we have a shouting match.
Although there was no question attached to the original post so any 'debate' is presumably meant, as often, to consist of a few outraged opinions which go too far followed by some counter reaction and before you know it we have a shouting match.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.