@youngmafbog
If there were any Buffs in the UK, I'm sure the plane spotters would be all over them. Or the Mercans would be rounding them up, like the Greeks once did to a bunch of unwary Brit spotters, at a dual-use airport, some years back.
I prefer to imagine that we treat the Rus as if they are on a hair trigger and carry out no act which they could then leap on as 'provocation' for whatever military move they would dearly like to make next.
They are Clint Eastwood, inviting us to "make (their) day".
In the cold war, the US did have their bombers flying in rotation 24/7/365, possibly using Canadian airspace by prior arrangement such that, if ICBMs wiped out SAC on the ground and missile silos before the return strike could be enacted, then there would still be enough bombers in the air to fly over the pole and deliver the return strike, even allowing for losses on the way.
So, on the whole, we do not indulge in 'sabre rattling' missions. These would only serve to undermine the narrative of fine, upstanding Western Alliance versus threatening, corrupt, Russian kleptocracy. We know that things are painted the exact other way around in Russia. Gurd knows whether their TV stations play the intercept footage at all, let alone how they spin the story. As long as the footage only shows ocean and avoids any identifiable pieces of coastal geography, they can pretend, to the home audience that it was a training mission harrassed by NATO fighter jets, or some such grollicks.