ChatterBank1 min ago
Am I The Only One Hoping That When Jihadi John Is Captured ......
75 Answers
It's not by us? I hope a non EU force captures him or we'll spend ten years agonising over yuman rites etc. Hopefully the Syrians or Jordanians will catch him.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I understood perfectly what PP was saying (not always the case).
I'd rather the British captured him.... I think, although it's true UK security services didn't do anything much about him before. The Syrians would be more likely to take him out and shoot him, but since that's undoubtedly what he wants, I'd much rather he saw out his remaining years in a British prison.
I'd rather the British captured him.... I think, although it's true UK security services didn't do anything much about him before. The Syrians would be more likely to take him out and shoot him, but since that's undoubtedly what he wants, I'd much rather he saw out his remaining years in a British prison.
"So the quality of mercy is better in Amman than it is in London ( in your opinion )
its been a long time coming and clearly you havent been to Amman
then I apologise for mistaking that you wished that he was shot out of hand on capture. "
who said anything about the quality? I think I've explained twice that in this case I would prefer it if he was not put through our due process. The reason for that is that I do not want to watch 10years of SOJ whinning along with the Islington set about human rights and extradition wranglings based on whether the US/Jordan/Japan promises not to top him. You should not assume that this stance is the same in every possible case, I'm talking about this case only. It's really quite simple to grasp.
its been a long time coming and clearly you havent been to Amman
then I apologise for mistaking that you wished that he was shot out of hand on capture. "
who said anything about the quality? I think I've explained twice that in this case I would prefer it if he was not put through our due process. The reason for that is that I do not want to watch 10years of SOJ whinning along with the Islington set about human rights and extradition wranglings based on whether the US/Jordan/Japan promises not to top him. You should not assume that this stance is the same in every possible case, I'm talking about this case only. It's really quite simple to grasp.
@TTT
Oh, probably the "Hopefully the Syrians or Jordanians will catch him." bit.
The Syrians might want to torture him for the latest intel on ISIS positions, then try him for the beheading of one of their troops, which he carried out personally and the Jordanians might want to do to him what they did to their pilot (after a trial and not specifically for what was done to the pilot).
Oh, probably the "Hopefully the Syrians or Jordanians will catch him." bit.
The Syrians might want to torture him for the latest intel on ISIS positions, then try him for the beheading of one of their troops, which he carried out personally and the Jordanians might want to do to him what they did to their pilot (after a trial and not specifically for what was done to the pilot).
// The Syrians would be more likely to take him out and shoot him, but since that's undoubtedly what he wants, I'd much rather he saw out his remaining years in a British prison. //
I don't really care what he wants. I prefer it if he was dead, and whether that's by drone strike, execution by the Syrians or whatever doesn't bother me one way or the other. If he also wants to die, so much the better.
If he does end up in prison, I don't want it to be here where we'd have to pay for him to live out his days in relative comfort.
I don't really care what he wants. I prefer it if he was dead, and whether that's by drone strike, execution by the Syrians or whatever doesn't bother me one way or the other. If he also wants to die, so much the better.
If he does end up in prison, I don't want it to be here where we'd have to pay for him to live out his days in relative comfort.
retrocop
/// The account I read was that Bin Laden was raising an AK47 when the Seal entered the room. He would of been a legit target and not shot out of hand.It is known as self defence! ///
Not if they had been British troops then under our ridiculous 'rules of engagement' the weapon would have to be directly pointed at you with the safety latch off and one's opponent's finger on the trigger.
/// The account I read was that Bin Laden was raising an AK47 when the Seal entered the room. He would of been a legit target and not shot out of hand.It is known as self defence! ///
Not if they had been British troops then under our ridiculous 'rules of engagement' the weapon would have to be directly pointed at you with the safety latch off and one's opponent's finger on the trigger.
aog
Having first got the Rules of Engagement card out of Battledress top pocket first and read it to Bin Laden first.
The point I was making was that I don't think he was shot out of hand.
The sneaky beakies probably briefed the seals pre op to bring him back alive if possible for future potential Intel unless....... we know the rest. No tax payer paying for his legal aid.
Having first got the Rules of Engagement card out of Battledress top pocket first and read it to Bin Laden first.
The point I was making was that I don't think he was shot out of hand.
The sneaky beakies probably briefed the seals pre op to bring him back alive if possible for future potential Intel unless....... we know the rest. No tax payer paying for his legal aid.
Latest Posts
News1 min ago
Starmer In Jobs Push.....right Oh!
News16 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Time For A Limit On Angry Posts
ChatterBank29 mins ago
News43 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.