What probably sticks in most people's craw about this is that Ms Nzolameso, who appears to have done little or no work in her life and seems unlikely ever to do so, can afford to live in just about the most expensive areas of the country because the taxpayer is picking up the bill for her accommodation. Meantime, a young couple both working hard in decent jobs and with three children of similar ages would not even come close to being able to do so.
Many people bang on about the need for "equality". So how does this situation demonstrate equality? My fictitious working couple, when faced with increasing rent in the area they live, cannot simply go to their employers and demand extra wages to cover the cost. They have to make decisions about their future and often that involves moving to a less expensive area. For them that will be far more problematic than it is for Ms Nzolameso because they will have to incorporate either a job change or change of travelling habits to get to work.
“She didn't do anything wrong to lose her tenancy in Westminster…”
No, her mistakes began long before that. She should not have become pregnant three times when she clearly did not have the means to support even one child, let alone more. I’d love to have the tenancy of an agreeable flat in the centre of London (especially if someone else was paying my rent). I cannot afford to and I don’t see any reason why I should contribute towards enabling Ms Nzolameso to do so. It’s an unfortunate fact of life that property in London (and most other leading cities) is very expensive and those who live there – whether doing so at their own or other people’s expense – must be prepared to move out when they (or the taxpayer) can no longer afford to fund their property.