"ladies" Day At The Grand National, Photographers Could Be Banned.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3014124/Photos-finished-Aintree-set-BAN-photographers-taking-pictures-badly-dressed-women-Grand-National-meeting-avoid-embarrassing-pictures-like-these.html

/// 'We have talked about trying to monitor those photographers, so if we see any element clearly looking for a negative shot and we can identify that, we will take their accreditation off them and we'll kick them off the site. ///

/// 'That's not easily manageable, but that's what we'll endeavour to do.' ///

Why kick the photographers off the site, why not kick off the offending "Ladies"?????

[RandyMarsh]

which event would you rather go to, this one where you could get laid or Ascot where you might see some nice shoes?

[HansUrbancka]

//Why did the Guardian need to print a photograph of a baby being breast fed, was that also for the titillation of their male readers? //

Surely it's the baby that was being titillated.!!

Hans.

[andy-hughes]

Comedy gold!!!!

[Gromit]

AOG
One feeding baby is accesible for illustrative purposes.

The Guardian didn't use 9 photographs and 2 videos.

I guess the Mail and the Guardian know their readers wants.

[ludwig]

4th picture down, I reckon that's princess Anne on the right in the hat.

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

/// One feeding baby is accesible for illustrative purposes. ///

/// The Guardian didn't use 9 photographs and 2 videos. ///

The Mail used that amount of photographs to illustrate how widespread the problem is, and it is not just an isolated incident.

/// I guess the Guardian know their readers wants. ///

What being titty fed you mean?

[HansUrbancka]

I think it's a matter of which newspaper was keeping abreast of things.

Hans.

[andy-hughes]

Stop it - my sides may split!!!

[Zacs-Master]

"The Mail used that amount of photographs to illustrate how widespread the problem is, and it is not just an isolated incident."

Of course they did, of course they did.

[anotheoldgit]

Zacs-Master

Was it worth the time just coming on, so as to agree with me?

[Zacs-Master]

Now don't be coy. We both know I was being derisive.

[andy-hughes]

It's always worth coming on to agree with you AOG!!!

[Gromit]

AOG,
I posted at 10:41 to agree with you but you decided to argue anyway :-)

[-Talbot-]

How can you tell someone is a sl@g just by looking at them ?

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

AOG,
/// I posted at 10:41 to agree with you but you decided to argue anyway :-) ///

Agreeing with one particular point does not exclude you from further argument regarding all other statements you make. :0)

[anotheoldgit]

-Talbot-

/// How can you tell someone is a sl@g just by looking at them ? ///

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/03/27/05/191B5AA1000005DC-0-image-a-1_1427433806486.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/04/article-2596282-1CD4050E00000578-598_964x614.jpg

Still not sure then perhaps a trip to Specsavers might help, :0)

[-Talbot-]

How from that picture can you tall that these women are sl@gs?

[Zacs-Master]

The first picture is too well composed and lit for it not to be 'staged'. The second one just look like a normal bunch of ladies to me.

[Svejk]

Where, I want to know, are the ABsisterhood. Shouldn't they be on here defending a wimmin's right to look (and act) like a drunken slapper.
Not that I think they're that bad, but then I've seen Ladies Day at Newcastle(shudder)

[RandyMarsh]

which set would you rather have a pint with Mick?