Body & Soul6 mins ago
Couple Forced To Sell Home After Nhs Refuse To Fund Daughter's Treatment For Rare Illness.
63 Answers
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/uk/57 6462/Br ighton- home-se ll-sick -child
Perhaps if she was a non UK citizen and suffering from a self inflicted illness, there would be no problem?
Perhaps if she was a non UK citizen and suffering from a self inflicted illness, there would be no problem?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The simple fact is that people with this condition usually have a normal life span. It is not life threatening although it is nasty and difficult to live with.
At £30k a year it is a very expensive drug that is prescribed on the NHS for people with life threatening cancer, that will no longer need the drug after a relatively short time either because their cancer is in remission or the cancer has killed them.
This drug will not cure this little girl, it will alleviate the symptoms only.
At £30k a year it is a very expensive drug that is prescribed on the NHS for people with life threatening cancer, that will no longer need the drug after a relatively short time either because their cancer is in remission or the cancer has killed them.
This drug will not cure this little girl, it will alleviate the symptoms only.
The 30K they need would presumably pay for the required treatment at a non NHS Hospital. Like many other unfortunate patients who have been led to believe that the NHS is there to treat all UK citizens free at the point of delivery, they & we have been & are being fobbed off with these statements which to me are quite scandalous. As we are constantly being told by successive governments '' The NHS is safe in our hands''. What prt of the NHS are they talking about ?
//
hc4361
This isn't for hospital treatment, it is simply a prescription for the drug. It is a tablet taken once a day with water.
As far as I know there has always been cases where treatment has been refused due to cost versus benefit. This drug is routinely prescribed to save lives. // OK the news headline states '' The NHS refuse to fund treatment'' so is not the NHS there to save lives or to repeat my question '' is the NHS there for some UK patients but not others when the going gets tough ?
hc4361
This isn't for hospital treatment, it is simply a prescription for the drug. It is a tablet taken once a day with water.
As far as I know there has always been cases where treatment has been refused due to cost versus benefit. This drug is routinely prescribed to save lives. // OK the news headline states '' The NHS refuse to fund treatment'' so is not the NHS there to save lives or to repeat my question '' is the NHS there for some UK patients but not others when the going gets tough ?
Quite recently there was an excellent Documentary on C4 - it illustrated how these decisions were taken every day and set out the cost of treating one person that same amount could keep alive 10 (rough example).
It became very clear to me how incredibly difficult it is to decide when after all we are talking about quality of life or even life or death itself.
Worth seeking the programme out.
http:// www.cha nnel4.c om/prog rammes/ nhs-2-b illion- a-week- countin g
It became very clear to me how incredibly difficult it is to decide when after all we are talking about quality of life or even life or death itself.
Worth seeking the programme out.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.