Donate SIGN UP

Time To Pull It Down

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 12:48 Thu 18th Jun 2015 | News
37 Answers
or flog it to developers?

I for one dont want that much of my hard earned spent on MP's

http://news.sky.com/story/1504140/bill-for-crumbling-parliament-could-hit-7-1bn
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 37rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
If you pulled Parliament down, where would you put the MP's, given that the size of premises they would need, plus costs for security, infrastructure and so on would be colossal, so a bill is going to come from somewhere.

Personally, I think enough of our history is destroyed routinely by developers and Luddite councillors, so they should do what is necessary to save this iconic building.
can't see where the 7bn comes from, what are going to rebuild it with? gold!
Let's look at the development of another old site which took place recently.

Demolition of Southwark Towers £450m
Building The Shard and The Place on the site £1.5bn

Total cost, less than 2 billion pounds.

So it's obvious what we should do with Parliament - demolish and build something else of a "landmark" nature.
It's a tough call, an iconic building - add to that the huge cost of demolition plus temporary rehousing then rebuilding of a new parliamentary home.

I am for the refurb.
Of course we could also follow current business trends and seriously downsize them. Then outsource all the support functions (I'm sure the like of Capita, Serco, etc who have made such inroads into the NHS would find it a doddle).
It's a fabulous piece of architecture, famous throughout the world, it has to be restored, it was the last example of English high-craftsmanship.
nec plus ultra.
-- answer removed --
But it won't be restored with the same degree of high-craftsmanship, and you'll end up with a "rebuilding" rather than a "restoring": it just will not be the same building will it?
//andy-hughes
If you pulled Parliament down, where would you put the MP's...//

a "big shed" distribution warehouse near the M6 would be perfect.
I agree with andy and Khandro It embodies much of our history and is known through out the world as one of the most iconic emblems of GB.If you dont think it's worth it I suggest you stand on Westminster Bridge on a sunny afternoon and try and count the different nationalities that have come to look at it.It's value as a tourist attraction is huge,you don't get that many people fying half way round the world to "selfie" themselves in front of the Shard.
Question Author
Andy, I was thinking Milton Keynes or nearer Birmingham so they are in the middle of all of us.

It's pretty easy to secure a greenfield site, plenty of Banks manage it. In fact much easier than securing an old Victorian building in the middle of London.

Might not be so nice for the MP's but if we put a bar and a strip club in in, pretty sure most will be ok.

7Bn is just too much. It's not the original building anyway.
//It embodies much of our history and is known through out the world as one of the most iconic emblems of GB.//

then sell it to a developer with the proviso that they retain the external appearance. if converted to luxury flats, the developer will make back the cost many times over.
Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?
People fly halfway round the world just to get a selfie in front of Parliament ? Now I've heard it all.
Would it be a possible solution to start demolishing & rebuilding half of it then move MPs into the renovated area & start on the other half ? This would of course save the cost of accommodating MPs in temporary quarters whilst refurbishments take place.
-- answer removed --
7.1 BILLION ?
WHAT THE ''.... '' - IS SOMEONE HAVING A LAUGH ?

IS THE CORRIDORS GOING TO BE LINED WITH GOLD ?
Question Author
I still dont want to pay Billions for MP's WR.

Move them out of town like the rest of Minions have to put up with and peddle the building to a developer.

Quids in all round.
Does it matter how much longer it takes to repair the iconic historic building ? Such heritage isn't going to be left to be lost anyway.

And how come there is not already a secure set of building for when Parliament has to have a re-org ? Damned poor foresight on the part of those whose job it is to ensure a bright future for all.

1 to 20 of 37rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Time To Pull It Down

Answer Question >>