It isn’t only the “Little Britishers” whom you insolently describe those on here who doubt the advantages of EU membership, DTC. This article is very interesting (and there are quite a few of similar ilk around):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10793681/Without-reform-it-would-be-best-for-Britain-to-leave-EU.html
To save you ploughing through the whole lot, here’s a salient extract:
“If fundamental reform cannot be secured – and I am highly doubtful that it could be – then I believe the UK’s best interests would be served by leaving the EU,”
The article is an extract from a book “The Trouble with Europe” written by Roger Bootle. Of course it is your privilege to lump Mr Bootle in with the other “Little Britishers” but his book (which I have read) is a measured study of the advantages and disadvantages of EU membership. It focuses on the facts and avoids the usual hysteria and scaremongering that usually accompanies any suggestion of “Brexit”.
However, before you do that, you may care to examine his credentials. Roger Bootle is one of the City of London’s best-known economists. He runs the consultancy, Capital Economics, which specialises in macroeconomics and the economics of the property market. He is also Economic Adviser to Deloitte, a Specialist Adviser to the House of Commons Treasury Committee and an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries. He was formerly Group Chief Economist of HSBC and, under the previous Conservative government, he was appointed one of the Chancellor’s panel of Independent Economic Advisers.
So he probably knows a thing or two about such matters. Certainly more than me and possibly even more than you.
No, a unified Europe cannot be taken for granted, ichkeria. It has ot been achieved thusfar and the EU is the last institution likely to succeed in that aim.