Question Author
Your 12.36 post and my 12.41 post obviously crossed.
We have drawn a line and moved on a couple of times now, but you soon revert back to your old ways, just as I have said before.
This particular time started when you indirectly called me a racist, which in turn alienated me towards you.
This latest thread started off so peaceful but then you found it necessary to criticise me for calling you naive in the past, for no reason whatsoever.
Take this latest paragraph, why? when you are trying to offer up an olive branch?
/// "If anyone else following this exchange is finding it half as tedious as I am, they must wonder what on earth I am still doing engaging with you. ///
And then this,
/// It is because I hold a glimmer of hope that beneath this increasingly personal antagonistic prodding and provoking personality that you have developed of
late, ///
It is not I who has developed these traits but you who have brought them on, It is not very often that I find the need to defend myself against personal insults etc with any other poster on this site, but as I have said in the past if they insult me first, then I will retaliate in the same way that they do, and you are no exception.
And while we are on that subject, another thing that you are guilty of is the fact that if I or another ABer happen to be rude against certain ABers, (who you seem to so gallantly defend), you will take it on yourself to intervene, regardless of what has been taking place between the two parties beforehand.
It is not you place, to get so involved, and only goes to alienate that ABer who you try to chastise, against yourself.
/// the AOG I used to enjoy debating with is still around. ///
He certainly is, I have not changed, take a look at yourself, dust yourself down and lets start all over again.
In the true AnswerBank polite way that is.