Talbot - //andy hughes, I asked you how do you know the two women were innocent?
you answered with....
Are you seriously trying to defend this woman's behaviour by 'giving her the benefit of the doubt'?
Seriously?
Well no, I at no time would defend behaviour like that...now can you answer my question?
18:42 Fri 16th Oct 2015
I see you are posting so...any chance of an answer andy?//
Apologies for the delay – went out as you posted – just got back.
Of course, the most obvious response is that I do not know that the two women were innocent, but in my experience, if two people, or two lots of people are having an argument, there is an exchange going on, and if the women in question were giving as good as they got, I would be happy to assume with reasonable certainty, that they were playing their part in escalating the situation.
But the fact that they were silent, apart from exhanges to each other in their own language, and that all the shouting came from the woman we heard, it does infer that she started a rant, and simply got carried away when she got no reaction, apart from the one described, which probably served to inflame her anger even more.
This is all based on assumption, but I think given my explanation, it is reasonable.