Quizzes & Puzzles21 mins ago
Kenneth Noyes
I heard on hte radio this am that the parole board's recommendation that he be moved to an open prison has been rejected. Good. However, it made me think - his crime was one murder nearly 20 years ago - why is he still in prison anyway? don't get me wrong, he definately should be, but since when do people get 20 years + for murder? Don't get me wrong, i absolutely agree murderers shouldget this type of sentence, but they don't seem to usually get that long do they?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If ANY prisoner is in the last few years of a long sentence and they have obeyed the prison 'rules' they have a right to be considered for a move to 'open' conditions. The parole board say which prisoners are eligible for a move but the home office has the final word. I think that to say Noye was 'recommended' for transfer is yet another misinterpretation by the newspapers. It is more that he is now 'eligable for a possible transfer', but that does not evoke the response the paper is aiming at!
-- answer removed --
Read the link at 12.41
Noye was 'granted a parole hearing' the parole board then 'referred the matter to the secretary of state for a decision'
That is NOT a recommendation! In other words the parole board had to grant a hearing ,they had no choice the law says he must be at least granted a hearing, but they did not make a decision they just referred it to the secretary of state (home office) and the home office made the inevitable refusal .
Noye was 'granted a parole hearing' the parole board then 'referred the matter to the secretary of state for a decision'
That is NOT a recommendation! In other words the parole board had to grant a hearing ,they had no choice the law says he must be at least granted a hearing, but they did not make a decision they just referred it to the secretary of state (home office) and the home office made the inevitable refusal .
-- answer removed --
^^ In a less controversial case the parole board make the decision and the home office 'rubber stamp' it. But in this case the parole board refused to make a decision and sent the case direct to the home office.
So far from recommending his transfer they refused to consider it.
As I said, a nifty bit of 'half truth' from the newspapers.
So far from recommending his transfer they refused to consider it.
As I said, a nifty bit of 'half truth' from the newspapers.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.