ChatterBank20 mins ago
Is It Time To Tell The Right On Liberals Where To Get Off?
89 Answers
Internment, boots on the ground, send them to their maker, whatever.
Surely enough is enough, the friends and sympathisers of Jihad and those that just dont seem to get that a hard hand is required need to be told to shut it or join their mates in internment. The HRA and the scum lawyers feeding off it also need to go.
And as for schengen, that has to be the end, together with locking down all those bogus Asylum seekers. ISIS threatened to flood Europe, here we go.
This is only the beginning.
Surely enough is enough, the friends and sympathisers of Jihad and those that just dont seem to get that a hard hand is required need to be told to shut it or join their mates in internment. The HRA and the scum lawyers feeding off it also need to go.
And as for schengen, that has to be the end, together with locking down all those bogus Asylum seekers. ISIS threatened to flood Europe, here we go.
This is only the beginning.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm all for taking action where possible. I'm sure that I've barely shut up about how we should have been working harder to resolve the situation in Syria, for example. What difference that would have made in Paris is unclear, but allowing the war there to fester while ISIS rose up has been a stupid mistake.
And end to Schengen, though? And what counts as a sympathiser of Jihad? Zac-master, apparently, who by not instantly siding with you and others would apparently lose his freedom in your intended regime. No. Just no.
And end to Schengen, though? And what counts as a sympathiser of Jihad? Zac-master, apparently, who by not instantly siding with you and others would apparently lose his freedom in your intended regime. No. Just no.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The opposite of a totalitarian regime that jumps on and arrests people at even the slightest hint of dissidence isn't "sitting back and doing nothing". Of course we should work to combat terrorism as far as possible. Not at the expense of the freedoms we had previously worked so hard to achieve, though.
Would he have said that about Hitler? I doubt it.
However I challenge the assumption in his post - that closing our borders, prosecuting the sponsors of terror and cancelling our subscription to the mischievous ECHR is a renunciation of our traditional freedoms. It seems to me that they constitute necessary actions in their defence.
People who value freedom highly might care to reflect on the Tim Hunt affair.
-- answer removed --
I have to say, I agree with DB on this - I for one NEVER report posts here unless it's spam from people with throw away names. I am totally opposed to censorship.
Having said that, Zacs It's interesting to see that two of AB's resident right-wing extremists have a tendancy to 'hit and run' with their dogma.
At least AOG has the honour (clumsy though it often is) to discuss things further.
Having said that, Zacs It's interesting to see that two of AB's resident right-wing extremists have a tendancy to 'hit and run' with their dogma.
At least AOG has the honour (clumsy though it often is) to discuss things further.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.