Marshwarble. I don't think this is really to do with politics. Kraft made a promise before the merger went ahead and they broke it immediately after. The promise couldn't have been clearer and Keynsham deserved better than what they got. Like the Commons Select Committee, I draw the conclusion that Kraft were being less than honest when it came to their...
Mikey, companies run their businesses as they see fit. I think it's a pity that people lost their jobs, but it happens. Other companies expand and jobs are created. That's life.
Jobs in a place like Keynsham are important and you are still refusing to condemn the company that lied to its workers and then lied again before the Committee.
"its a pity" really doesn't cut the mustard Naomi...have you no compassion ?
Its not rocket science to condemn an asset-stripping, lying company like Kraft either, but apart from some "pity" you still refuse to do so. Interesting stance Naomi !
I'm a Labour supporter, Mikey, but I don't quite see what you expected Kraft to do. Compassion can only go so far. The chocolate companies did start as beneficial businesses, but so many food companies fold-look at the price of cocoa.
Marshwarble. I don't think this is really to do with politics. Kraft made a promise before the merger went ahead and they broke it immediately after.
The promise couldn't have been clearer and Keynsham deserved better than what they got.
Like the Commons Select Committee, I draw the conclusion that Kraft were being less than honest when it came to their evidence. I go further and state that I believed they lied, in order to get the merger underway. That is why we should be suspicious about the present situation regarding Terrys.
Beware of American businessmen bearing gifts perhaps ?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.