Donate SIGN UP

Escapes A Driving Ban Because He Didn't Understand His Speedometer, What's That All About?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 12:28 Sat 05th Dec 2015 | News
101 Answers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12032162/Yaya-Toure-escapes-driving-ban-because-he-was-confused-by-his-German-cars-speedo.html

Maybe next time his excuse could be, "I was driving on the wrong side of the road because I forgot we drive on the left in England"?



Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 101rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Mr.J2 was driving us in Caen a couple of years ago. It was a quiet Sunday morning with just the odd car around. He sped up a bit to catch a green traffic light - and received a notice about a week later! His speedometer was UK and he had, momentarily, forgotten to watch the less obvious Km per hour dial. Fair enough, we paid up. It isn't an excuse to be driving a foreign car in other words.
jomifl

Errr...you need to look up the word 'pejorative', because nothing in what I wrote was pejorative.

You've completely misused the word.

What I've stated is factual. Yaya misread his speedo, and some old people drive the wrong way up motorways, as proven by the links I provided. This does not suggest I am contemptuous of old people - in the same way that AOG is not contemptuous of black people by constantly posting threads where he has the opportunity to attack us.

It's just coincidental..

I'm sure AOG will back me up on this. I'm as ageist as he is racist...which is 'not at all'.
With the money he earns he could afford to employ a chauffeur.
-- answer removed --
But he doesn't need to, Sandy, as I have explained.

"The rich can afford clever solicitors who can think of clever excuses which judges believe "

I think I explained, joeluke, that no solicitor, clever or otherwise, was necessary. Nor was the "clever" (or rather pathetic) excuse. The outcome would almost certainly have been the same for anybody else or indeed for him had he simply represented himself.

There seems to be a widespread misapprehension that all footballers/pop stars/actors/businessmen (or anybody with a few bob) is automatically treated leniently when they face driving offences. This is usually on the basis that they have hired an expensive lawyer. Lawyers (whether expensive or those working on Legal Aid) can be persuasive - that's what they do. But the sentencing guidelines need to be examined before it is automatically assumed that they have received special treatment.
SP, I do not need look up the meaning of the word 'pejorative' as I know what it means and meant what I wrote.
Your reference to old people was snide and unnecessary. As you well know it is not what you think you said that is important but how it is perceived by others. If you don't understand me try explaining why you used the word 'old'. I can't think why you brought AOG and racism into your argument it won't work as a crutch here.
sp, I too find it strange that to prove you are not being ageist you list a number of links where old people caused the accidents.
I'm sure I've read in the past about lawyers saying that their client needs to drive long distances because of their work and offering that as a reason why a ban shouldn't be impose.
Surely that means a ban was an option?
And then you read further and see one wasn't imposed. Has this generation of magistrates gone soft?
-- answer removed --
It was in response to a post about sentencing guidelines.
He may have thought that one kilometre was about half a mile rather than being closer to five-sixths in which he would think he was doing 81mph instead of 101mph. As has been said, he pled guilty so that may have influenced his not being banned for a short period.
-- answer removed --
Speeding offences are normally considered if they are 10% over the limit plus 2mph so that would be 79mph on a motorway. If he had little traffic to compare his speed to, he may have thought he was doing closer to eighty instead of a hundred, I have no idea. I agree he was speeding either way but the law recognises the difference in magnitude when considering the penalties.
jomifl

You do need to look the word up, because you aren't making sense.

The words 'old' and 'pensioner' are not pejorative.

It's simply stating facts that there have been a number of cases recently where elderly people have put others in extreme danger, by driving the wrong way up a dual carriageway, or indeed, mistaking the accelerator for the brake pedal:

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/husband-may-mistaken-accelerator-brake-10515994

These cases all involve older people. We should not avoid discussing this, in the same way that AOG should not be castigated for continually posting critical threads about black people, Asians, gay people etc etc.
-- answer removed --
You've been busted, sp. Stop digging.
divebuddy

Eh?

Are you high?
divebuddy

I clearly stated that AOG didn't post this thread because he's black.

Indeed, the first mention of race was made by AOG at 13:01, when Islay pointed out the trend in AOG's posts.

AOG regularly posts threads in order to criticise minorities - I'm saying that he shouldn't necessarily be demonised as a bigot because of this.

I was defending this thread.

You need to read things a little more clearly.
-- answer removed --
I don't.

41 to 60 of 101rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Escapes A Driving Ban Because He Didn't Understand His Speedometer, What's That All About?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.