Sport0 min ago
Gay Cake
Should they continue with this or should they just accept the previous ruling of the court .
What's your opinion ?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -northe rn-irel and-354 74167
What's your opinion ?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This is a fascinating case because while plainly it is an appalling piece of mean spirited bigotry Peter Tatchell no less, has made a very honest re-appraisal of the specific verdict of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.
Which I believe was covered here recently.
"They need to grow up and get on with life, its a bloody cake! "
Well quite. Perhaps someone should tell the bakers that. And then we would not need these long drawn cases with the delicate balance of freedom of conscience/ speech versus gay rights etc. Ice the b***y thing the way you were asked, and paid, to do and move on
Which I believe was covered here recently.
"They need to grow up and get on with life, its a bloody cake! "
Well quite. Perhaps someone should tell the bakers that. And then we would not need these long drawn cases with the delicate balance of freedom of conscience/ speech versus gay rights etc. Ice the b***y thing the way you were asked, and paid, to do and move on
I said very early on during a previous thread on this subject, that the lawyers representing the bakery should have suggested that, the cake could not be made because it contravened copyright laws. In that they did not have permission to use images of Bert and Ernie, and that they were putting themselves in danger of being sued for linking the said images with a politically motivated agenda. Job done.
Thinking back to the case, there were myriad reasons why the bakers could have declined to complete the order, none of which would have landed them in court.
Their willingness to stand up for their beliefs is admirable, but perhaps discretion would have been the better part of valour in this instance.
Appealing a decision is tricky- I would suggest that they need to bring additional evidence that was not presented at the first hearing in order to stand a chance of an overturn.
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." - as Albert Einstein may have said.
Their willingness to stand up for their beliefs is admirable, but perhaps discretion would have been the better part of valour in this instance.
Appealing a decision is tricky- I would suggest that they need to bring additional evidence that was not presented at the first hearing in order to stand a chance of an overturn.
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." - as Albert Einstein may have said.