If Shamima Begum Managed To Smuggle...
ChatterBank20 mins ago
Agree Or Disagree?
158 Answers
http://
I wager that most are thinking exactly what Kate Hopkins has dared to say, but have been frightened in case they are accused of siding with a 'paedophile' or showing no sympathy for a 'child's' suffering etc etc.
Please don't turn this thread into a anti-Kate Hopkins or even anti-AOG, just comment on the case itself.
Yes we all know that he committed a UK criminal act, but is the media blowing this case out of all proportion?
I wager that most are thinking exactly what Kate Hopkins has dared to say, but have been frightened in case they are accused of siding with a 'paedophile' or showing no sympathy for a 'child's' suffering etc etc.
Please don't turn this thread into a anti-Kate Hopkins or even anti-AOG, just comment on the case itself.
Yes we all know that he committed a UK criminal act, but is the media blowing this case out of all proportion?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I wish I'd skived off school and learned to kick a ball between two posts, several paces apart. I could have been in hog heaven!
Listen up, kids. Don't choose the speccy *** option; you'll only end up fussy, trying to find an equally brainy (or brainier) wife and no woman will trust a man who could oursmart her.
Listen up, kids. Don't choose the speccy *** option; you'll only end up fussy, trying to find an equally brainy (or brainier) wife and no woman will trust a man who could oursmart her.
Agreed not a paedo in the now accepted meaning of the word.
But still very guilty.
Like I originally said on one of the previous posts, the girl involved was no angel , a slapper as far as Im concerned and also a now proven liar, based on court evidence.
Theres a ton like her and worse "hanging " around celebs, footballers especially, have seen the proof myself over the years and believe me without asking for ID it would be easy to get caught out, although in this case he knew her age, so no excuses for him.
But still very guilty.
Like I originally said on one of the previous posts, the girl involved was no angel , a slapper as far as Im concerned and also a now proven liar, based on court evidence.
Theres a ton like her and worse "hanging " around celebs, footballers especially, have seen the proof myself over the years and believe me without asking for ID it would be easy to get caught out, although in this case he knew her age, so no excuses for him.
@Achristie
"To call her a *** as Hopkins has is shameful. "
no its not, like Ive said ive met her sort and worse all trying to lay footballers specifically...i can provide footballers names if wanted, top level international players to non league.
These slappers would hang around outside specific clubs where the footballers used to go asking members to take them in because they knew they wouldnt get in by themselves but the clubs used to turn a blind eye if with a member..
"To call her a *** as Hopkins has is shameful. "
no its not, like Ive said ive met her sort and worse all trying to lay footballers specifically...i can provide footballers names if wanted, top level international players to non league.
These slappers would hang around outside specific clubs where the footballers used to go asking members to take them in because they knew they wouldnt get in by themselves but the clubs used to turn a blind eye if with a member..
Barsel - The language you have used in your previous answers seems to contradict your assertion....
The victim 'may' (and I use the word advisedly) have thrown herself at him but he ought to have had the sense/self-control to send her on her way.
He didn't, he allowed her crush on him to continue and grow into something illegal.
Bang to rights he's guilty......anything else is hot-air and justification for a bloke who doesn't deserve it.
The victim 'may' (and I use the word advisedly) have thrown herself at him but he ought to have had the sense/self-control to send her on her way.
He didn't, he allowed her crush on him to continue and grow into something illegal.
Bang to rights he's guilty......anything else is hot-air and justification for a bloke who doesn't deserve it.
She was 15.
He knew this.
At that point, as a grown man, he should have cut off all contact with him.
Let's just refocus this in the minds of those who think that 15 year olds are sophisticated enough to make decisions like this...
...if it was a 28 year old bloke who'd copped off with a 15 year old boy, would your attitude remain the same?
He knew this.
At that point, as a grown man, he should have cut off all contact with him.
Let's just refocus this in the minds of those who think that 15 year olds are sophisticated enough to make decisions like this...
...if it was a 28 year old bloke who'd copped off with a 15 year old boy, would your attitude remain the same?
Sqad
Not rent boys. This girl wasn't a hooker, so a rent boy wouldn't be an equivalency.
I'm talking about a 28 year old man coping off with a 15 year old boy.
I want to focus on that, because the reason that a 15 year old cannot have consensual sex is because (no matter what Katie Hopkins thinks), 15 year olds are not sophisticated enough to decide this for themselves.
We need to remove this idea of the little Lolita ensnaring the older man.
He's nearly twice her age.
She's a kid.
End of.
Not rent boys. This girl wasn't a hooker, so a rent boy wouldn't be an equivalency.
I'm talking about a 28 year old man coping off with a 15 year old boy.
I want to focus on that, because the reason that a 15 year old cannot have consensual sex is because (no matter what Katie Hopkins thinks), 15 year olds are not sophisticated enough to decide this for themselves.
We need to remove this idea of the little Lolita ensnaring the older man.
He's nearly twice her age.
She's a kid.
End of.
@bazwillrun
//no its not, like Ive said ive met her sort and worse all trying to lay footballers specifically//
When I was 15, girls would turn me down, as they knew I couldn't drive and they probably guessed I was still on pocket money income.
Please let me know if I start sounding like a misogynist. Then I can get a therapist to help cure me. Maybe.
@Cloverjo
I think I'd fail any stringent nerd test. When they introduced computer programming classes, at school, we were one year too old to be allowed to request to join. You can't bluff your way at coding; I know that much. (Likewise, no business studies or other life skills type stuff back then. Thanks, for nothing, skule).
//no its not, like Ive said ive met her sort and worse all trying to lay footballers specifically//
When I was 15, girls would turn me down, as they knew I couldn't drive and they probably guessed I was still on pocket money income.
Please let me know if I start sounding like a misogynist. Then I can get a therapist to help cure me. Maybe.
@Cloverjo
I think I'd fail any stringent nerd test. When they introduced computer programming classes, at school, we were one year too old to be allowed to request to join. You can't bluff your way at coding; I know that much. (Likewise, no business studies or other life skills type stuff back then. Thanks, for nothing, skule).
