ChatterBank1 min ago
Victory For Common Sense?
137 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
While I can appreciate that people may *feel* threatened if someone of the opposite sex walks into their toilet, such people have to go to the loo somewhere, right? How would men feel if someone who was outwardly a woman walked into their loo? Or, for that matter, what about all the gay men and women who have been in toilets along with other men/ women, and done absolutely nothing about it? I don't see that we should be legislating against perceived threats when no actual threat exists -- at least none that I'm aware of. So far as I'm aware, the threat of someone perving in the toilets has only been a hypothetical danger and never an actual one.
I don't think it's totally unreasonable to feel uncomfortable, I just don't think it's enough cause to provide grounds for legislating against it. Transpeople also need to go to the loo from time to time, and unless you are arguing for a third bathroom ("other"?), at least one person might feel uncomfortable whichever toilets they walk into.
Does "everyone else" really feel uncomfortable? And if so, what is the alternate solution, given that men might well feel equally threatened if a 'woman' (at least in outward appearance) walked into their toilets? You would need a third, fourth, or even higher set of toilets to cater for everything, presumably.
-- answer removed --
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the last bit, so I'll leave that for now. As to the first... yes, possibly, but again, the same problem will still emerge that whichever toilet they walk into risks causing discomfort to its other occupants by that logic. On the face of it, the most sensible place to go is the one where you look like you belong, at least at first glance.
// Avatar Image
divebuddy
Mamyalynne. Why do we bother to have separate male/female toilets at all then. Make 'em all unisex. // I cannot get my head round the business of sex segregation in toilets & rest rooms. We have loads of different visitors at home & of course they all visit the toilets which are non segregationist. Is it not a fact that if all public toilets were unisex governments & councils would save a whole bunch of money ?
divebuddy
Mamyalynne. Why do we bother to have separate male/female toilets at all then. Make 'em all unisex. // I cannot get my head round the business of sex segregation in toilets & rest rooms. We have loads of different visitors at home & of course they all visit the toilets which are non segregationist. Is it not a fact that if all public toilets were unisex governments & councils would save a whole bunch of money ?
-- answer removed --