I don't think there is, Mikey.....and plenty of room in the mouth yet... Pro-life with exceptions.....he says....... That can't be. Does he decide on the exceptions.....which life should be saved....which aborted? Bonkers man......absolutely bonkers.....with not a saving grace at all......x
Chuck enough controversy out there, some of it doesn't work and you claim it wasn't what you meant: much will find support with some group who will hear it and only it. It's a strategy that seems to bear fruit.
You need to wipe the hatred from your eyes and see reality.
It is now becoming a reality that he could end up as President. Did you see the C4 documentary? Even with the left wing bias it was still quite something to see.
On the plus side, at least Trump has shown his wonderful gift for uniting disparate groups. Literally everybody in America stood up and spoke out against him on this one.
Even the most ardent pro-lifers in the US don't agree with Trump. I think that says everything about the argument AOG and Sqad are regrettably supporting.
Perhaps it is thought that for most women in that position the experience was punishment enough ? That they need help rather than condemnation ? If they thought society gave help before they went ahead then maybe they'd have chosen a different path.
Serial abolitions would tend to indicate someone who simply doesn't care though. One might want to treat them to different help than the rest.
If there is a valid reason for an abortion then it will be carried out legally.
If not it is the taking of a life, apart from the fact that it would encourage back street abortions, which can in turn could lead to untold complications even death for the woman.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.