News1 min ago
Pc49 Changes Into Robo Cop
96 Answers
To all the Islamic sympathisers on here who often say, "we have always had killings on our streets" or "we have always had terrorism, just look at the IRA", I say this:
"That may well be, but the change from PC49 to Robo Cop, lies firmly at the door of ISLAM".
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2016 /08/04/ 04/36D5 4CF0000 00578-3 722890- The_hea vily_ar med_off icers_c arry_se mi_auto matic_S IG_Carb ine_rif l-a-96_ 1470280 763575. jpg
"That may well be, but the change from PC49 to Robo Cop, lies firmly at the door of ISLAM".
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Zacs - //Andy, can you remember what you write from one minute to the next?
10.08 - 'You appear to continue to experience difficulty in separating your opinion from fact, so I will repeat - I am wrong in your opinion, not in fact.'
10.12 - 'I am perfectly willing to admit that my opinion is not expertly informed'
10.18 - Me....'So how can you claim it as 'fact'? You...'I don't.' //
Flattered as I am that you, among others, spend your time dissecting my posts in detail (other posts are available) - this is only going to descend into a spat about who says what and how, which is dragging the thread off-topic.
So much as I am delighted to have my every thought analysed and picked apart (which must say something for the power of my arguments that they are never ignored!) I must decline to go further on this aspect, and confirm that I am returning to the thread topic when a suitable post arrives.
10.08 - 'You appear to continue to experience difficulty in separating your opinion from fact, so I will repeat - I am wrong in your opinion, not in fact.'
10.12 - 'I am perfectly willing to admit that my opinion is not expertly informed'
10.18 - Me....'So how can you claim it as 'fact'? You...'I don't.' //
Flattered as I am that you, among others, spend your time dissecting my posts in detail (other posts are available) - this is only going to descend into a spat about who says what and how, which is dragging the thread off-topic.
So much as I am delighted to have my every thought analysed and picked apart (which must say something for the power of my arguments that they are never ignored!) I must decline to go further on this aspect, and confirm that I am returning to the thread topic when a suitable post arrives.
-- answer removed --
andy-hughes, you haven’t been drawn off thread. At 15:23 Thu you told us, quite voluntarily, what you believe Islam to be, and you told us what you believe Islamic terrorists to be. I am asking you why you don’t believe what Islam tells us and why you don’t believe what the terrorists tell us. A perfectly reasonable question but one you’re clearly unwilling to answer.
Naomi - //andy-hughes, you haven’t been drawn off thread. At 15:23 Thu you told us, quite voluntarily, what you believe Islam to be, and you told us what you believe Islamic terrorists to be. I am asking you why you don’t believe what Islam tells us and why you don’t believe what the terrorists tell us. A perfectly reasonable question but one you’re clearly unwilling to answer. //
I have said previously - and it appears you choose not to remember - that I choose not to debate issues or Islam or terrorism with you because I take exception to your unfounded superior approach to such exchanges, where you consistently wish to appoint yourself as the authority, and me as the unknowing.
So I repeat, hopefully for the last time - your direct questions to me will not be receiving a response, in the interests of you not being given a platform to preach from, and me being irritated by your approach, and the entire thread derailed by our petty exchanges, to the detriment and possible removal of the thread.
I have said previously - and it appears you choose not to remember - that I choose not to debate issues or Islam or terrorism with you because I take exception to your unfounded superior approach to such exchanges, where you consistently wish to appoint yourself as the authority, and me as the unknowing.
So I repeat, hopefully for the last time - your direct questions to me will not be receiving a response, in the interests of you not being given a platform to preach from, and me being irritated by your approach, and the entire thread derailed by our petty exchanges, to the detriment and possible removal of the thread.
Hypognosis - //@andy_hughes
I cannot challenge you to read the Koran unless I agree to do the same myself. Before I do that, please assure me that it's not a dull read. //
How would I know - as you point out, I have not read it, so I am unable to comment on the entertainment value contained.
There are an number of 'resident experts' on such matters as Muslim texts and beliefs, clearly they do not include me as I am told on a daily basis, so I can only direct your enquiry in that direction.
I cannot challenge you to read the Koran unless I agree to do the same myself. Before I do that, please assure me that it's not a dull read. //
How would I know - as you point out, I have not read it, so I am unable to comment on the entertainment value contained.
There are an number of 'resident experts' on such matters as Muslim texts and beliefs, clearly they do not include me as I am told on a daily basis, so I can only direct your enquiry in that direction.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.