Gromit
// each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending. //
/// I can't believe how stupid that statement is. ///
Really this from the Independent.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rio-2016-team-gb-olympic-medals-55m-each-can-we-justify-brits-slump-sofa-a7198906.html
*** In the poorest areas like Yorkshire and Humber, 67,000 fewer people are involved in sport. In Doncaster the decline is over 13 per cent, whereas in well-heeled Oxford, it’s up 14 per cent. ***
*** All over the country, ageing swimming pools are being closed by councils anxious to save money on repairs. Most will be in the poorest areas. Local authority cuts have seen playing fields sold off and opening hours of existing facilities curtailed. ***
*** It’s been estimated that each medal in Rio has cost £5.5m of public funding. There are some tough questions to be asked about whether financial priorities should be re-aligned to focus on the many, rather than the few. ***
Yes and those few are mostly educated in Public schools, Universities etc.
One has to be pretty rich to take part in equestrian sports and how many secondary modern school pupils get to take part in a little rowing and sailing?
No the Olympics are mainly for a chosen few, I would have thought that such events would be completely against Leftist's ideals?