Crosswords1 min ago
Do We Really Need Two Separate 'heroes' Victory Celebrations?
113 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-37 49624/A -parade -fit-Br itain-s -Olympi c-heroe s-PM-or ders-vi ctory-c elebrat ion-des pite-fi nancial -concer ns-turf -wars.h tml
Hasn't enough money been thrown at this two week event already?
£347m of lottery money has been spent on the event and they say that each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending.
Most of these minority interest events create attention for only 2 weeks every 4 years how many of us rush out every week to watch little pole vaulting for example?
Hasn't enough money been thrown at this two week event already?
£347m of lottery money has been spent on the event and they say that each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending.
Most of these minority interest events create attention for only 2 weeks every 4 years how many of us rush out every week to watch little pole vaulting for example?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Lottery money should not be used to fund things that the Government SHOULD be funding through direct taxation. The lottery fund is specifically for projects that are not directly funded by the tax payer.
In the case of Sport, it is perfectly proper that lottery money is used, and tax payer money isn't. It is a good thing to fund, for the nations health and well being. The clutch of medals are a confirmation of a job well done. Even if we had won no medals, the £350million would have been well spent.
// each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending. //
I can't believe how stupid that statement is.
In the case of Sport, it is perfectly proper that lottery money is used, and tax payer money isn't. It is a good thing to fund, for the nations health and well being. The clutch of medals are a confirmation of a job well done. Even if we had won no medals, the £350million would have been well spent.
// each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending. //
I can't believe how stupid that statement is.
-- answer removed --
http:// www.deb ate.org /opinio ns/are- the-oly mpic-ga mes-a-w aste-of -money
57% say the Olympic Games are a waste of money, while 43% say they are not.
57% say the Olympic Games are a waste of money, while 43% say they are not.
Gromit
// each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending. //
/// I can't believe how stupid that statement is. ///
Really this from the Independent.
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /voices /rio-20 16-team -gb-oly mpic-me dals-55 m-each- can-we- justify -brits- slump-s ofa-a71 98906.h tml
*** In the poorest areas like Yorkshire and Humber, 67,000 fewer people are involved in sport. In Doncaster the decline is over 13 per cent, whereas in well-heeled Oxford, it’s up 14 per cent. ***
*** All over the country, ageing swimming pools are being closed by councils anxious to save money on repairs. Most will be in the poorest areas. Local authority cuts have seen playing fields sold off and opening hours of existing facilities curtailed. ***
*** It’s been estimated that each medal in Rio has cost £5.5m of public funding. There are some tough questions to be asked about whether financial priorities should be re-aligned to focus on the many, rather than the few. ***
Yes and those few are mostly educated in Public schools, Universities etc.
One has to be pretty rich to take part in equestrian sports and how many secondary modern school pupils get to take part in a little rowing and sailing?
No the Olympics are mainly for a chosen few, I would have thought that such events would be completely against Leftist's ideals?
// each medal that has been won cost £5.5m of public spending. //
/// I can't believe how stupid that statement is. ///
Really this from the Independent.
http://
*** In the poorest areas like Yorkshire and Humber, 67,000 fewer people are involved in sport. In Doncaster the decline is over 13 per cent, whereas in well-heeled Oxford, it’s up 14 per cent. ***
*** All over the country, ageing swimming pools are being closed by councils anxious to save money on repairs. Most will be in the poorest areas. Local authority cuts have seen playing fields sold off and opening hours of existing facilities curtailed. ***
*** It’s been estimated that each medal in Rio has cost £5.5m of public funding. There are some tough questions to be asked about whether financial priorities should be re-aligned to focus on the many, rather than the few. ***
Yes and those few are mostly educated in Public schools, Universities etc.
One has to be pretty rich to take part in equestrian sports and how many secondary modern school pupils get to take part in a little rowing and sailing?
No the Olympics are mainly for a chosen few, I would have thought that such events would be completely against Leftist's ideals?
I never thought I would see AOG directing me to an article by Janet Street Porter.
JSP is wrong because lottery money was never meant to replace local council spending on parks and public swimming pools. Those local amenities have always been provided by local tax payers.
She is right to say the austerity cuts have hit the poorest the most, but incorrect is saying lottery money should be used to mask the damage of the cuts.
JSP is wrong because lottery money was never meant to replace local council spending on parks and public swimming pools. Those local amenities have always been provided by local tax payers.
She is right to say the austerity cuts have hit the poorest the most, but incorrect is saying lottery money should be used to mask the damage of the cuts.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.