Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 48rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
No.
this is the caring sharing NHS as engineered by the present government - no contract, no treatment, because without it, the facility won't be paid.
It's not the way to treat anyone. Clearly something wrong with the management and their protocols.
If this story was centred around the USA, then the cry of the AB lefties would have been:

"Thank God for our NHS."
Sqad - //If this story was centred around the USA, then the cry of the AB lefties would have been:

"Thank God for our NHS." //

And if my aunty had .....

Your point is?
It appears to have been a common sense bypass. Whoever told this gentleman that he could not receive attention because he was not registered was a) not engaging his/her brain and b) not following the (apparently) protocols for the surgery.
Andy-Hughes........if i have to explain my point.........then please ignore my post.
Sqad

It's unlikely that a story like this based on a case in the US would ever make it to AB.

What 'the lefties' (sigh) would no doubt praise the NHS for, would be a case where the equivalent pensioner being refused treatment at all local surgeries because he had no Medicaid/Medicare.

Seriously - it's MUCH better to be poor and sick in the UK, than it is in the US. It's not even comparable.
Sp, the surgery admitted protocols weren't correct so it wasn't possible to follow them.
'We will be strengthening our accident protocol as a result and hope Mr Brown is recovering well.'

Put a comma between 'this' and 'based' in order to make my first sentence above make sense.
Z-M

Yes, I see your point. Whilst first aiders have helped in the past, perhaps it has not been formalised.

Sqad - //Andy-Hughes........if i have to explain my point.........then please ignore my post. //

That's just it - there is no point!

Why conjure up a meaningless scenario just to have a pop at the 'lefties' - if that is all you are doing, it's best if everyone ignores your post.
//It appears to have been a common sense bypass//
you can say that again, especially as they refused to give him a plaster (according to the report)
No and thankfully they have admitted it wasn't dealt with correctly.

Hope they get their act together pronto.
O.K....on the advice from A-H........please ignore my meaningless post.
It is about expectation.

The commercial US system is expected to possibly decide that they aren't a charity. The NHS is paid for by all citizens for all citizens and a refusal to treat is neither expected nor acceptable. It's one thing to have a system for normal appointment access but not right to use that to justify refusing aid to an NHS customer with a problem that occurred nearby and needs medical help.
It sounds like it was just a mistake - someone didn`t understand the protocol of the practice that has been put right in case something similar happens in the future.
Question Author
Sqad

/// O.K....on the advice from A-H........please ignore my meaningless post. ///

I will not ignore it squad, in this free country of which we are fortunate to live in, we do not want others to inform what is a meaningless post and which posts we should ignore.
237SJ - //It sounds like it was just a mistake - someone didn`t understand the protocol of the practice that has been put right in case something similar happens in the future. //

I don't think that will fly for a minute.

If you work in a caring profession, the instinct to help someone who is hurt trumps 'protocol' any day.
Question Author
A voice in the theatre shouted "is there a doctor in the house" and a voice came back asking "is the person registered with me"?

1 to 20 of 48rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This The Way To Treat Our Own?

Answer Question >>