It appears to have been a common sense bypass. Whoever told this gentleman that he could not receive attention because he was not registered was a) not engaging his/her brain and b) not following the (apparently) protocols for the surgery.
It's unlikely that a story like this based on a case in the US would ever make it to AB.
What 'the lefties' (sigh) would no doubt praise the NHS for, would be a case where the equivalent pensioner being refused treatment at all local surgeries because he had no Medicaid/Medicare.
Seriously - it's MUCH better to be poor and sick in the UK, than it is in the US. It's not even comparable.
Sp, the surgery admitted protocols weren't correct so it wasn't possible to follow them.
'We will be strengthening our accident protocol as a result and hope Mr Brown is recovering well.'
The commercial US system is expected to possibly decide that they aren't a charity. The NHS is paid for by all citizens for all citizens and a refusal to treat is neither expected nor acceptable. It's one thing to have a system for normal appointment access but not right to use that to justify refusing aid to an NHS customer with a problem that occurred nearby and needs medical help.
It sounds like it was just a mistake - someone didn`t understand the protocol of the practice that has been put right in case something similar happens in the future.
/// O.K....on the advice from A-H........please ignore my meaningless post. ///
I will not ignore it squad, in this free country of which we are fortunate to live in, we do not want others to inform what is a meaningless post and which posts we should ignore.
237SJ - //It sounds like it was just a mistake - someone didn`t understand the protocol of the practice that has been put right in case something similar happens in the future. //
I don't think that will fly for a minute.
If you work in a caring profession, the instinct to help someone who is hurt trumps 'protocol' any day.