ChatterBank7 mins ago
Ashers Bakery Lose Same-Sex Cake Appeal
Common sense at last, they run a business if you bake a cake in Liverpool colours does not mean that you support Liverpool!
They were in the wrong and its about time the accepted it.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Islay. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.andy-hughes. I take it you’ve changed your mind then. OK. Firstly, the Burka isn’t a choice that all women who wear it make, so I can only assume that those who support a woman’s right to wear it also support a man’s, or indeed, a religiously motivated political regime's right to subjugate her. Secondly, the burka is not conducive to integration. Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly to this discussion, the burka is NOT a religious requirement. As I said, there is no comparison between the subject of the OP and the discussion that you are now attempting to open up.
-- answer removed --
DB ...all the various court cases that have evolved in this affair, have made it quite clear that it was not reasonable to refuse to take the order for the cake.
The family have lost...twice, including their appeal, so that is the end of it !
I doubt you were present in any of the Court Hearings, so what do you know that the Courts were unaware of ?
The family have lost...twice, including their appeal, so that is the end of it !
I doubt you were present in any of the Court Hearings, so what do you know that the Courts were unaware of ?
Naomi - //mikey, it has indeed - and at andy-hughes' and Islay's instigation. Read the posts! //
Oh come on!!!
You have been every bit as eager to defend your view as I have, and nothing wrong with that.
But don't start saying 'It was him sir ...' when mikey suggests that we have dominated the thread. We have - and I have no problem with that.
I am surprised at you!
Oh come on!!!
You have been every bit as eager to defend your view as I have, and nothing wrong with that.
But don't start saying 'It was him sir ...' when mikey suggests that we have dominated the thread. We have - and I have no problem with that.
I am surprised at you!
-- answer removed --
mikey - //DB ...all the various court cases that have evolved in this affair, have made it quite clear that it was not reasonable to refuse to take the order for the cake. //
As I understand it, the issue was not that the bakery refused to take the order, rather that they did take the order, and then a week later, advised the customer that they were cancelling the order on grounds that broke the law.
As I understand it, the issue was not that the bakery refused to take the order, rather that they did take the order, and then a week later, advised the customer that they were cancelling the order on grounds that broke the law.
-- answer removed --
DB ( 15:47)....I am not sure what that has to do with your assertion at 15:31, that it was a "reasonable excuse to not make the cake"
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -northe rn-irel and-377 48681
A quote from the BBC link :::
"Appeal court judges said that, under law, the bakers were not allowed to provide a service only to people who agreed with their religious beliefs"
Again, I am unclear why you are gainsaying the verdict of the Appeal Court ?
http://
A quote from the BBC link :::
"Appeal court judges said that, under law, the bakers were not allowed to provide a service only to people who agreed with their religious beliefs"
Again, I am unclear why you are gainsaying the verdict of the Appeal Court ?
divebuddy - //Endlessly saying the same thing over and over and over again, isn't. //
Speaking personally, I endeavour to make my point a different way if I feel I am not getting it over the first time.
When I believe my point has been made, I will move on, and I will also move on to suit side issues and subsequent points that others bring up.
I should stress that I do not see 'making my point' as having anyone or everyone agreeing with what I say - that is absolutely not the case.
Speaking personally, I endeavour to make my point a different way if I feel I am not getting it over the first time.
When I believe my point has been made, I will move on, and I will also move on to suit side issues and subsequent points that others bring up.
I should stress that I do not see 'making my point' as having anyone or everyone agreeing with what I say - that is absolutely not the case.
-- answer removed --
DB....yes it is the end of the affair, unless the bakery owners decide to appeal to the appeal. Until they do, the latest judgement of the Appeal court still stands.
So your assertion that it was a "reasonable excuse to not make the cake"
is wrong....not by my understanding of it, but by the Courts.
So your assertion that it was a "reasonable excuse to not make the cake"
is wrong....not by my understanding of it, but by the Courts.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.