Quizzes & Puzzles56 mins ago
Pembrokeshire Family Win Housing Benefit Cut Court Ruling
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -wales- south-w est-wal es-3792 4799
Some of you will recall this case which I have brought up in the past.
Marvellous result for this family but what a great pity that the Government had put them through hell for years.
Some of you will recall this case which I have brought up in the past.
Marvellous result for this family but what a great pity that the Government had put them through hell for years.
Answers
The change in rules was always going to cause problems for some, they should have been able to act quicker than they have eventually done in these cases.
13:19 Wed 09th Nov 2016
The changes can be nasty Mamy, as this case proves. Even their Local MP would seem to agree that he current regime is traumatic ::::
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/polit ics/dis ability -benefi t-test- dwp-ste phen-cr abb-tra umatic- iain-du ncan-sm ith-the resa-ma y-a7405 206.htm l
http://
also "put them through hell" might well be an overstatement too - according to the HC judgemet, the council covered and continued to cover the shortfall, so it seems (on the surface anyway) that they are the ones who hve persued this, even though they didnt have to.
I sound like i am support the cuts here, and im not, and i agree the legal process has taken ages, but they could have stopped it whenever they wanted and not been out of pocket
I sound like i am support the cuts here, and im not, and i agree the legal process has taken ages, but they could have stopped it whenever they wanted and not been out of pocket
bednobs , They could not have stopped when they wanted! The case was ongoing, if they had stopped the council would have won by default.
(which ,I am certain the council hoped would happen)
They would have had to pay back all the overpayment!
This has now set an important precedent for the future. Councils will have to be much more careful in future on implementing the 'bedroom tax' where there is a severely disabled person with needs for a carer involved.
(which ,I am certain the council hoped would happen)
They would have had to pay back all the overpayment!
This has now set an important precedent for the future. Councils will have to be much more careful in future on implementing the 'bedroom tax' where there is a severely disabled person with needs for a carer involved.
Bednobs....yes this family DID need to go to the Supreme Court....from the BBC link above ::::
"Judges dismissed a government appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling in favour of Paul and Susan Rutherford, who care for their grandson Warren.
The Supreme Court ruled the housing benefit cut discriminated against them"
Because the Government lost this at the Supreme Court, the Government will have to be more careful in the future, when they have similar cases to consider. The Government could have accepted that they were wrong at any time, thus saving much public money and time being wasted.
"Judges dismissed a government appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling in favour of Paul and Susan Rutherford, who care for their grandson Warren.
The Supreme Court ruled the housing benefit cut discriminated against them"
Because the Government lost this at the Supreme Court, the Government will have to be more careful in the future, when they have similar cases to consider. The Government could have accepted that they were wrong at any time, thus saving much public money and time being wasted.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.