ChatterBank2 mins ago
More Trouble For The Bias Broadcasting Corporation?
19 Answers
Not perhaps as bad as the Clinton News Network but the BBC are supposed to be impartial. The way they behave when there is news that the the arrogant, self-selecting, self-perpetuating ‘liberal’ elite or their celebrity sycophants who have been lording it over the rest of us for far too long and are now getting their cumuppence is unacceptable.
Time for them to go, they have had chance after chance to get their house in order afterall.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-39 21030/T ory-MP- leads-f urious- backlas h-again st-BBC- biased- coverag e-Donal d-Trump -s-elec tion.ht ml
Time for them to go, they have had chance after chance to get their house in order afterall.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Oh Labour often have a go at Auntie, it's what politicians do.
https:/ /www.rt .com/uk /345066 -corbyn -labour -bbc-bi as/
A bit like footballers haranguing the referee, hoping to sway future decisions their way.
https:/
A bit like footballers haranguing the referee, hoping to sway future decisions their way.
I have no doubt that the BBC are biased. It’s glaringly obvious with the soppy, sentimental way they report on the migrants.
Just before the Referendum, on the day Dr. Sarah Wollaston changed from ‘leave’ to ‘remain’ there was a rather lengthy interview with a German born, UK raised doctor, who spoke very eloquently about how much better the NHS would be outside of the EU, and why.
The interviewer (Simon McCoy, I think), kept trying to interrupt, but the doctor wouldn’t let him, and just carried on talking calmly. When the interviewer tried to blame the state of the NHS on the old folk, the doctor very calmly blew that theory out of the water.
I was so impressed, that I looked on the BBC website hoping to put a link on AB. It wasn’t there.
An hour later, the BBC showed a few seconds of the interview, only by then it had been edited so much, it looked like the doctor was saying something entirely different!
Just before the Referendum, on the day Dr. Sarah Wollaston changed from ‘leave’ to ‘remain’ there was a rather lengthy interview with a German born, UK raised doctor, who spoke very eloquently about how much better the NHS would be outside of the EU, and why.
The interviewer (Simon McCoy, I think), kept trying to interrupt, but the doctor wouldn’t let him, and just carried on talking calmly. When the interviewer tried to blame the state of the NHS on the old folk, the doctor very calmly blew that theory out of the water.
I was so impressed, that I looked on the BBC website hoping to put a link on AB. It wasn’t there.
An hour later, the BBC showed a few seconds of the interview, only by then it had been edited so much, it looked like the doctor was saying something entirely different!
I wonder if anyone dared call the DM a biased paper, back in the 30's ?
https:/ /www.go ogle.co .uk/sea rch?q=h urrah+f or+the+ blacksh irts&am p;rlz=1 C1CHBF_ en-GBGB 707GB70 7&e spv=2&a mp;biw= 922& ;bih=58 7&t bm=isch &tb o=u& ;source =univ&a mp;sa=X &ve d=0ahUK Ewj0wY3 p8Z3QAh XLLMAKH SEwBBMQ sAQIJQ
https:/
-- answer removed --
So one very right wing newspaper is a bad thing compared to the Observer, Guardian, Independant etc etc etc Maybe it's time you start your own version of Pravda or resurected Marxism Today Mikey, it'll ensure your needs are met although looking at the list below, I'd suggest you are covered!
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/List_ of_left -wing_p ublicat ions_in _the_Un ited_Ki ngdom
https:/
I did not watch all of the BBCs US election coverage, but I watched some of it. I did not see any bias. Andrew Neill is very good at presenting even handedly, and was doing a fine job. There was genuine shock that Trump had triumphed, and the Beeb reflected that in the coments of its guests. Reporting the shock of the result is not an example of bias. The shochk was part of the story as it unfolded.
As has already been commented on, to link to a highly biased newspaper to support the claim that the BBC is biased, is somewhat ironic.
As has already been commented on, to link to a highly biased newspaper to support the claim that the BBC is biased, is somewhat ironic.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.