Law1 min ago
Judge's Verdict - Cryogenics Case 14Yo
31 Answers
Has the judge's heart ruled his head?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-39 47826/T eenager -cancer -victim -14-Bri tish-ch ild-cry ogenica lly-fro zen-win ning-co urt-bat tle-aga inst-fa ther.ht ml
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No obvious reason why the brain could not be rebooted in the future, no one can accurately predict what humans will be able to do many years from now. But I'm unsure the same person would result from it, who went into the freezer initially.
One normally complies with a dying wish if it is possible/feasible. Seems fair enough to me in this case. One should not give hope to deny the request afterwards.
So she was frozen as she was about to die. When I heard the story earlier today I wondered how there could be a court case to decide after she had died while her body was deteriorating. Turns out the issue was already cut & freeze dried.
One normally complies with a dying wish if it is possible/feasible. Seems fair enough to me in this case. One should not give hope to deny the request afterwards.
So she was frozen as she was about to die. When I heard the story earlier today I wondered how there could be a court case to decide after she had died while her body was deteriorating. Turns out the issue was already cut & freeze dried.
If you believe in the human "Soul" then the body is now irrelevant so maybe these cryo criminals, ahem I meant cryo scientists might try and figure out how to entrap the "Soul" and put it into another body.
As others have said, who knows how far and what we may be able to do in the future.
Sounds ridiculous? I'm just trying to instill some hope into the parents of the shark that Damien Hirst has in formaldehyde in Saatchis Gallery.
As others have said, who knows how far and what we may be able to do in the future.
Sounds ridiculous? I'm just trying to instill some hope into the parents of the shark that Damien Hirst has in formaldehyde in Saatchis Gallery.
Looking at it from that perspective: I don't think any soul needs entrapment. Did it need to be trapped to "attach" to the body of a baby about it be born ? There is a body suitable for a soul to experience life in; either one takes up the offer or does not.
If none take up the option, does the body remain a corpse, or does it activate as an "empty" zombie-like creature ?
If none take up the option, does the body remain a corpse, or does it activate as an "empty" zombie-like creature ?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.