If You Wanted Confirmationour...
News1 min ago
Drop The Brexit Case Appeal?
Oliver Letwin thinks it a bad idea to go to the Supreme Court preferring the issue to be settled in Parliament. Do you think he has a point?
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes of course it is !
Parliament should decide these matters, not a coterie inside Number Ten. That is what the High Court said, and Mrs May is showing contempt for our legal system by bringing the appeal before the Supreme Court.
She will lose this entirely unneeded appeal and then will have to debate A50 and voted on by Parliament, and she will be left with egg of her face.
Get a grip Mrs May !
Parliament should decide these matters, not a coterie inside Number Ten. That is what the High Court said, and Mrs May is showing contempt for our legal system by bringing the appeal before the Supreme Court.
She will lose this entirely unneeded appeal and then will have to debate A50 and voted on by Parliament, and she will be left with egg of her face.
Get a grip Mrs May !
// No,if the appeal should be allowed.....//
no - or Yes - AB readers can read the High Ct judgement [ caution - no rhyming slang - no Essex dialect like foo for 'through' - no phrases like 'darn sarf yeah?']
https:/
and IF they do
they will see what these MPs are arn abart yeah ?
ALso - the govts of Scotland and Wales have applied to be joined in the appeal ( yeah means they can stand up and yak too yeah ? at the judge )
and so a possibiity of a regional veto rears its head
( actually it doesnt - but not many of them can read either apparently )
I mean you just read the doc - yeah even new Judge yeah who seems not to have yet - and its pretty obvious that it wont be turned over on appeal
the basic issues are
1.what parliament makes parliament unmakes
2.referenda dont have legal force ( wh we knew anyway)
3.and what happens to treaty rights granted under the treaty - can a minister sign them away without parliamentary say-so ( no of course not )
Ollie and his pals say that it is pretty obvious what the (judges') answers are to questions 1 to 3
no - or Yes - AB readers can read the High Ct judgement [ caution - no rhyming slang - no Essex dialect like foo for 'through' - no phrases like 'darn sarf yeah?']
https:/
and IF they do
they will see what these MPs are arn abart yeah ?
ALso - the govts of Scotland and Wales have applied to be joined in the appeal ( yeah means they can stand up and yak too yeah ? at the judge )
and so a possibiity of a regional veto rears its head
( actually it doesnt - but not many of them can read either apparently )
I mean you just read the doc - yeah even new Judge yeah who seems not to have yet - and its pretty obvious that it wont be turned over on appeal
the basic issues are
1.what parliament makes parliament unmakes
2.referenda dont have legal force ( wh we knew anyway)
3.and what happens to treaty rights granted under the treaty - can a minister sign them away without parliamentary say-so ( no of course not )
Ollie and his pals say that it is pretty obvious what the (judges') answers are to questions 1 to 3
Danny...what the Judges said is that Parliament must take the A50 through to a vote. As Khandro has pointed out, this judgement has nothing whatsoever to do with BREXIT......its all abut the sovereignty of Parliament. And the appeal will caertainly fail, as has also been pointed out by New Judge.
All this has been explained ad nauseum.
All this has been explained ad nauseum.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.