Mikey:
"TTT,,,you are again mixing up UKIP with anything, and everything else !" - no I am pointing out that your silly usage of raw figures can apply to our own election too.
"In the FPTP system, UKIP got exactly the amount of seats that it was entitled too....ie one. The Tories won fair and square." - Yes and the Electoral collage system is similar to FPTP and Trump won under that so why are you belly aching over irrelevant statistics?
"If you are advocating a system of PR, then please start your own thread and see how it runs. I seem to recall that we were offered a vote on one system of PR, just after the 2010 Election and it was roundly defeated." - I am not and never have I merely mentioned PR because that appears to be what you are advocating here because you have found an irrelevant statistic that would have meant your favoured candidate would have won.
"But in America they also work the FPTP system, but are hampered by the EC issue, which has distorted the result." by distorted you mean you lost?
"I ask the same question again....if it had been Trump that got more votes, would you be content if Hilary had won instead ? " - as I said above I would accept the result, Obviously I would not be happy with the outcome but I would be content with the system regardless of the numbers of votes because that is irrelevant.I would not be running around trying to find a way that i really won using statistics.