Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 225rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
Got there before me snooker.
13:48 Sat 21st Jan 2017
Question Author
Avatar Image
jackthehat

Mark as Best Answer

I'm not sure why you think he would need to adopt children....

13:58 Sat 21st Jan 2017


I am not sure two blokes can produce an offspring.
Lol....

They would need a female intermediary but both he and Lance could (probably) father children of their own.
I'd think most lesbian or gay couples are far more likely to use surrogates. Like you and I...they want children of their own.
Question Author
Are lesbians not gay pasta, you missed out homosexuals.
You're grasping at straws now playing with words.

Homosexual

Def

Sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.

So that word covers everyone involved.


Choice of words is simply that - choice.
Question Author
Pasta did not use the H word mammy, that's the point.
Pasta can use words she wants to, as can we all.
horrors, the H word ... covers ears
Highdiver?
Actually I didn't use the (horrors!) H word as it almost seems outdated...and I wanted to specify both male and femail.

Oh!... I should have included transgenders also,as they too may make use of surrogates.
Such a shame we don't have an editing facility.
Question Author
Hardly outdated, after all, our species is homo sapiens.

Gay is just a word pirated, it was once used to describe a cheerful occurrence
What do you actually object to?
No matter what, it seems that some can do no harm, I am convinced that if it were to be a heterosexual relationship, the male being (for example) a professional footballer, we would see a much more different attitude being shown.
Certainly, AOG, people would probably care even less!
Question Author
No objection. Just find it queer ( correct word usage) that a 22 year old man wants to marry a man 20 years his senior and have a "diving team of kids" , break up and engage in unsavoury on line activities.

Maybe I find the modern world difficult to accept.
Not from me, AOG. A person's life should stay private, as far as I'm concerned. None of our business at all.

No we wouldn't, AOG....

Tom and Lance were 'on a break' which means they may, or may not, have got back together. Whatever they got up to during that time they have dealt with since they have been reunited.

It's really no-one else's business.

Although this thread is really just another opportunity to have a pop at 'promiscuous homosexuals'; which all of them/us are perceived to be.
He broke up and had online sex BEFORE he and his partner decided to get married and BEFORE he said he wanted kids.

Before the days of the internet no one have knew about it.

People break up all the times, see other people and get back together. That doesn't make their morals questionable.

How do you feel about heterosexual swingers and such like?
Question Author
I would suggest that toms' online activities were certainly promiscuous

21 to 40 of 225rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Odd Reading In Papers Today

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.