Motoring1 min ago
Trump And The Truth
Trump estimated that the crowds at his inauguration were between 1,000,000 and 1,500,000 - in an area that holds a maximum of 720,000.
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/am ericas/ preside nt-dona ld-trum p-press -secret ary-att acks-me dia-ina ugurati on-atte ndance- sean-sp icer-a7 539776. html
What do you think, looking at the picture in the report?
http://
What do you think, looking at the picture in the report?
Answers
It is not about crowd numbers as such but the reporting of the numbers based upon photographs taken at the time. No-one cares about the colour of Trump's tie but if photos show it is red and his team insists it is blue and everyone else is a liar, questions would be asked.
11:10 Sun 22nd Jan 2017
Who's telling lies?
Photo from the Independant
https:/ /static .indepe ndent.c o.uk/s3 fs-publ ic/styl es/stor y_mediu m/publi c/thumb nails/i mage/20 17/01/2 2/08/in augurat ion.jpg
Photo from the New York Times
https:/ /static 01.nyt. com/ima ges/201 7/01/22 /us/22w hbriefi ng/21in augurat ionphot os11-ma ster675 .jpg
Photo from the Independant
https:/
Photo from the New York Times
https:/
Well, it looks pretty plain to me, and Obama did get a bigger attendance.
But that is not the whole story though is it ?
Half a million people marched on Washington that day, protesting about Trump, and many, many, more did the same all over the world were protesting on that day....how many people were protesting about Obama 8 years ago ?
But that is not the whole story though is it ?
Half a million people marched on Washington that day, protesting about Trump, and many, many, more did the same all over the world were protesting on that day....how many people were protesting about Obama 8 years ago ?
AOG
But the photos are saying the same story.
The photo printed in the Independent is taken at a much higher angle, which shows the sparseness of the crowds at the back.
However, the photo from the New York Times is much shallower. Therefore, it doesn't show how thin the crowd was at the middle and rear.
But the photos are saying the same story.
The photo printed in the Independent is taken at a much higher angle, which shows the sparseness of the crowds at the back.
However, the photo from the New York Times is much shallower. Therefore, it doesn't show how thin the crowd was at the middle and rear.
-Talbot-
I think the reason this story is important, is because it shows how easily hurt the Leader of the Free World is.
He's a man who sends tweets out at 02:30 criticising Saturday Night Live when they take the mickey out of him.
He's the President of the United States, but seems to have the sensibilities of a sorority princess.
I think the reason this story is important, is because it shows how easily hurt the Leader of the Free World is.
He's a man who sends tweets out at 02:30 criticising Saturday Night Live when they take the mickey out of him.
He's the President of the United States, but seems to have the sensibilities of a sorority princess.
mikey4444
/// Well, it looks pretty plain to me, and Obama did get a bigger attendance. ///
It is obvious that there would be more blacks attending Obama's inauguration.
/// Half a million people marched on Washington that day, protesting about Trump, and many, many, more did the same all over the world were protesting on that day....how many people were protesting about Obama 8 years ago ? ///
Which highlights the Leftie mind set, if you don't get your way, riot and protest on the streets.
Are you in favour of smashing windows and setting alight cars mikey?
/// Well, it looks pretty plain to me, and Obama did get a bigger attendance. ///
It is obvious that there would be more blacks attending Obama's inauguration.
/// Half a million people marched on Washington that day, protesting about Trump, and many, many, more did the same all over the world were protesting on that day....how many people were protesting about Obama 8 years ago ? ///
Which highlights the Leftie mind set, if you don't get your way, riot and protest on the streets.
Are you in favour of smashing windows and setting alight cars mikey?