ChatterBank0 min ago
No Jail For Spitting In Babys Face!!!
People have gone to jail for pulling a Hijab off a woman's face, but a man with 3 previous racist hate crimes, goes free for spitting in bays face, as he has Physiological problems!!!
http:// metro.c o.uk/20 17/02/2 1/racis t-woman -hater- spat-in -babys- face-an d-shout ed-whit e-peopl e-shoul dnt-bre ed-6463 332/
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm gutted!
But my point is still valid though - 'opinions' about assaults are not valid in law, which is why the law works the way it does.
I am really sorry to find that my opinion is not valued enough for you to leap in and challenge every single thing I say, having minutely dissected it, and rearranged it incorrectly first.
Still, it is a change ...
But my point is still valid though - 'opinions' about assaults are not valid in law, which is why the law works the way it does.
I am really sorry to find that my opinion is not valued enough for you to leap in and challenge every single thing I say, having minutely dissected it, and rearranged it incorrectly first.
Still, it is a change ...
//the constant hysteria screaming racism and homophobia that pervades this section on a daily basis//
And what was this mans attack then Andy, if it wasn't Racist?
/// ‘white people shouldn’t breed’///
If I'd been a witness to it he would still have been face-down on the floor when the Police arrived.
Whilst I certainly think, with his past convictions, that he's potentially very dangerous, my understanding is that the judge was also mindful of the fact that he would likely forego his psychiatric treatment if he went to prison. We clearly have a choice then since he couldn't be incarcerated for very long for such a crime, do we send him to prison where his mental state will deteriorate or do we try to 'fix' him and make sure that he's not a threat any longer. It's repellent but I'd rather he had treatment since he's ill than didn't and progressed his crimes because he lacked help. That serves no-one.
What this man did is very wrong but the accusations that a white man would not get away with it is not really true is it!
!
This fine piece of white manhood didn't do too badly
http:// metro.c o.uk/20 16/11/2 3/man-d enies-p unching -newbor n-baby- in-the- face-sa ying-he -though t-it-wa s-a-dol l-62774 07/
!
This fine piece of white manhood didn't do too badly
http://
Baldric - //And what was this mans attack then Andy, if it wasn't Racist?
/// ‘white people shouldn’t breed’///
It was racist - I have not suggested otherwise, but just because people with mental issues are racist in the street doesn't excuse people being racist on here - why, did you think somehow it did?
/// ‘white people shouldn’t breed’///
It was racist - I have not suggested otherwise, but just because people with mental issues are racist in the street doesn't excuse people being racist on here - why, did you think somehow it did?
Samjenko - //If this was the other way around you would be charged with racially aggravated assault and definitely, without a shadow of a doubt, go to clink. //
By '...the other way around ... ' I assume you mean a white man attacking an Asian baby? If the circumstances were identical, then a white man would not go to prison either.
As I have pointed out, this man was not jailed based on his need for psychiatric treatment, not the colour of his skin.
//And I'll further guarantee that no-one would be cheering louder than you, andy. //
Your 'guarantee' mechanism is definitely faulty - that's twice in quick succession you;ve got it wrong, I'd turn it off if I were you.
By '...the other way around ... ' I assume you mean a white man attacking an Asian baby? If the circumstances were identical, then a white man would not go to prison either.
As I have pointed out, this man was not jailed based on his need for psychiatric treatment, not the colour of his skin.
//And I'll further guarantee that no-one would be cheering louder than you, andy. //
Your 'guarantee' mechanism is definitely faulty - that's twice in quick succession you;ve got it wrong, I'd turn it off if I were you.
Ive had my name mentioned enough times in my local newspaper to know that journalists are always economical with the truth. As someone who has had (simultaneously) both mental health issues and criminal law issues and reading in the press only what the journalist chose to report, I can no longer believe anything I read in the rags. More the fool you if you do.
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - //The white man punches baby thing was aired on AB. nearly everybody said that he should have gone to jail.
But of course, the usual apologists don't say that when a black/Asian is the accused. //
It was, and I don't recall saying that he should not have gone to jail.
But if he was found to be suffering from a psychiatric illness, and incarceration would have exacerbated it, then I would have been in favour of him not being sent to jail. But that was not the circumstance there, but it is here.
For the third time, this man did not avoid prison because of the colour of his skin.
But of course, the usual apologists don't say that when a black/Asian is the accused. //
It was, and I don't recall saying that he should not have gone to jail.
But if he was found to be suffering from a psychiatric illness, and incarceration would have exacerbated it, then I would have been in favour of him not being sent to jail. But that was not the circumstance there, but it is here.
For the third time, this man did not avoid prison because of the colour of his skin.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.